2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating natural capital performance of urban development through system dynamics: A case study from London

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhao, P. et al [39] developed an integrated two-stage dynamical model of the power system to quantitatively assess the environmental impacts of the integrated development of urban subsurface resources, including the integrated development of subsurface space and subsurface materials. O'Keeffe, J. et al [40] utilized a system-dynamics model to quantify and evaluate the impact of London's urban design on the relationship between the natural and built environments. Relevant researchers have adopted a system-dynamics approach to simulate and compare the evolutionary states of different resilience subsystems within the city, and to explore the resilience mechanisms of the city at different stages of development [41,42].…”
Section: System Dynamics Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao, P. et al [39] developed an integrated two-stage dynamical model of the power system to quantitatively assess the environmental impacts of the integrated development of urban subsurface resources, including the integrated development of subsurface space and subsurface materials. O'Keeffe, J. et al [40] utilized a system-dynamics model to quantify and evaluate the impact of London's urban design on the relationship between the natural and built environments. Relevant researchers have adopted a system-dynamics approach to simulate and compare the evolutionary states of different resilience subsystems within the city, and to explore the resilience mechanisms of the city at different stages of development [41,42].…”
Section: System Dynamics Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.2 Subsystem analysis and variable selection 3.2.1 Natural subsystem. The natural subsystem contains the basic resources for regional development and plays a central role in maintaining social resilience, enhancing social wellbeing and promoting economic growth and sustainable development (Guerry et al, 2015;Bateman and Mace, 2020;O'Keeffe et al, 2022). The area and yield of crops are the basis for ensuring food security and providing important support for sustainable livelihoods (Leng et al, 2019).…”
Section: System Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, a poor understanding of the multiple benefits and impacts that different risk reduction measures might have is ultimately hampering a transition toward Nature Based Solutions (NBS, e.g., wetlands, swales, green roofs, etc.) which is recommended by the European Commission (European Commission, 2016) and supported by recent research (Albert et al, 2019;O'Keeffe et al, 2022;Palmer et al, 2015;Schanze, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%