2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating models to estimate flame characteristics for free-burning fires using laboratory and field data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we also found a similar multiplicative relationship (FH ¼ 6.75 I 0.53 , r ¼ 0.85, P ¼ 0.0005). We are aware of the limitations of the outdoor wind tunnel to reproduce wildfire behaviour in the field (Anderson et al 2006, Marino et al 2012b). Nevertheless, as reported for other fire behaviour parameters (e.g.…”
Section: Effect Of Fuel Treatment Type On Fire Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we also found a similar multiplicative relationship (FH ¼ 6.75 I 0.53 , r ¼ 0.85, P ¼ 0.0005). We are aware of the limitations of the outdoor wind tunnel to reproduce wildfire behaviour in the field (Anderson et al 2006, Marino et al 2012b). Nevertheless, as reported for other fire behaviour parameters (e.g.…”
Section: Effect Of Fuel Treatment Type On Fire Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple photographs were also taken as the fire approached each post, and these were used to produce separate estimates of flame length and flame angle by trigonometry. Flame length in photographs was measured from the mid-point of the flame base to the tip of the continuous flame area (Anderson et al 2006), discounting any disjunct areas of flame above the main body. Flame angle was estimated as the displacement of the flames from the upright monitoring post.…”
Section: Estimating Flame Properties During Experimental Firesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flame properties, including height, length, and angle, are also important in determining processes such as maximum fire spotting distance (Albini et al 2012), crown fire potential (Alexander and Cruz 2011), and minimum fire break widths (Wilson 1988). Importantly, previous research (e.g., Byram 1959;Thomas 1963, Nelson andAdkins 1986;Anderson et al 2006) has shown that fireline intensity and mean flame length are closely related. This means that flame lengths can provide an important visual signal of the controllability and potential ecological effects of fires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of fuel consumption is necessary to compute fire intensity, together with the heat of combustion of the fuel and the rate of spread. Flame characteristics are important to many applications of fire behavior and effects: flame length is related to fire intensity, flame height is important in determining crowning potential, and flame angle and height are necessary to determine the amount of radiative heat transfer (Anderson et al, 2006).…”
Section: Reduction Factormentioning
confidence: 99%