2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating investments in portability and interoperability between software service platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are similar requirements such as independence of (1) the operating system, (2) the middleware, and (3) the programming language. Haile [31] mentioned that the software could not provide portability to itself and its module due to (1) different types of programming framework, (2) proprietary application programming interface (API), and (3) its data format. Thus, Haile [31] listed up requirements as (1) common programming framework, (2) standardized API, and (3) data format for the standard API.…”
Section: The Portability and Its Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are similar requirements such as independence of (1) the operating system, (2) the middleware, and (3) the programming language. Haile [31] mentioned that the software could not provide portability to itself and its module due to (1) different types of programming framework, (2) proprietary application programming interface (API), and (3) its data format. Thus, Haile [31] listed up requirements as (1) common programming framework, (2) standardized API, and (3) data format for the standard API.…”
Section: The Portability and Its Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haile [31] mentioned that the software could not provide portability to itself and its module due to (1) different types of programming framework, (2) proprietary application programming interface (API), and (3) its data format. Thus, Haile [31] listed up requirements as (1) common programming framework, (2) standardized API, and (3) data format for the standard API. In this paper, we followed characteristics of the portability described by Beningo, J.…”
Section: The Portability and Its Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interoperability issue arises on the client side while fetching the precision value and an array with null value services (methods) from UDDI. After the establishment of WSIG, when any of these services would be invoked from UDDI, the client requests to be forwarded to a JADE gateway agent [36].…”
Section: Jade-wsigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an optimal investment level in terms of investment income. Overall, through good management, service platform providers can not only understand how interoperability and portability investments affect costs, enable cost-effective service integration, and create value but also design new strategies for optimizing investments (Haile & Altmann, 2017); thus highlights can have a positive effect on service delivery quality.…”
Section: Service Delivery Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%