2002
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-002-8193-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Interface Esthetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study, they used a factorial design to test the effects of symmetry and number of compositional elements on interface aesthetics. Basically, their findings were similar to Ngo et al [22] study. However, it was difficult to practically compare their findings with Ngo et al [22] study, because they used a different approach and different formulas to calculate the values of the two tested measures in their experiments.…”
Section: Screen Layout-based Measuressupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In their study, they used a factorial design to test the effects of symmetry and number of compositional elements on interface aesthetics. Basically, their findings were similar to Ngo et al [22] study. However, it was difficult to practically compare their findings with Ngo et al [22] study, because they used a different approach and different formulas to calculate the values of the two tested measures in their experiments.…”
Section: Screen Layout-based Measuressupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Methods in this approach are motivated by earlier aesthetic measures developed by Birkhoff [12], Tullis' quantitative techniques for evaluating screen design [19], and Gestlest theory for visual design [13,22].…”
Section: Screen Layout-based Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations