Evaluating emergency response capacity by fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach

Ju, Yanbing; Wang, Aihua; Liu, Xiaoyue

doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.061

Cited by 116 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As we can see, this problem of emergency response solutions evaluation is characterized with both qualitative and quantitative assessment, obviously, it thus can be categorized as multi-criteria decision making (MCGDM) problems [8,14], that is, let X " tx 1 , x 2 , ..., x n u be a set of emergency response solutions, C " tc 1 , c 2 , ..., c m u be the set of criteria. Define D " td 1 , d 2 , ..., d t u as the decision makers in an evaluation team responsible for the evaluation of all solutions X " tx 1 , x 2 , ..., x n u.…”

Section: Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation (Erse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Consider one of the emergency management problems (adapted from Ju, et al [14]), as explained in Section 2.1, the community development department (CDD) of a major city that holds a state-level special economic zone needs to regularly evaluate a set of alternative response solutions against urban fire hazards.…”

Section: Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Correspondingly, when community development department (CDD) evaluates alternative emergency response solutions to potential risks of emergency scenarios, decision criteria should be derived from these three stages. Generally speaking, emergency response solution is a group of procedures to be implemented in case of a catastrophic event situation involving risk analysis, communication, intervention actions, operational support, logistic support, and whatever is necessary to reduce accident impacts [6][7][8]14,49]. Following suggestions of practices [50] and the lifecycle theory of emergency management [48,51], effective emergency response solutions should be prepared to cover three stages: pre-event, during-event and after-event.…”

Section: Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation (Erse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When evaluating response solutions to urban fire accidents, according to lifecycle theory in emergency management, the following four indicators can be derived as main decision criteria [8,14,54,55].…”

Section: Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation (Erse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[8] introduced a DS/AHP based group multi-criteria decision making method in which Dempster-Shafer theory was utilized for expressing incomplete and uncertain information. Reference [14] developed fuzzy AHP based a multi-criteria decision making method where decision preferences was represented by a 2-tuple linguistic variable. Recently, [7] put forward another hybrid multi-criteria decision making method that also hired a 2-tuple linguistic variable to elicit uncertain preference information.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evaluating Emergency Response Solutions for Sustainable Community Development by Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approaches: IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Emergency management is vital in implementing sustainable community development, for which community planning must include emergency response solutions to potential natural and manmade hazards. To help maintain such solution repository, we investigate effective fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making (FMCGDM) approaches for the complex problems of evaluating alternative emergency response solutions, where weights for decision makers and criteria are unknown due to problem complexity. We employ interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy (IVDHF) set to address decision hesitancy more effectively. Based on IVDHF assessments, we develop a deviation maximizing model to compute criteria weights and another compatibility maximizing model to calculate weights for decision makers. Then, two ideal-solution-based FMCGDM approaches are proposed: (i) by introducing a synthesized IVDHF group decision matrix into TOPSIS, we develop an IVDHF-TOPSIS approach for fuzzy group settings; (ii) when emphasizing both maximum group utility and minimum individual regret, we extend VIKOR to develop an IVDHF-VIKOR approach, where the derived decision makers' weights are utilized to obtain group decision matrix and the determined criteria weights are integrated to reflect the relative importance of distances from the compromised ideal solution. Compared with aggregation-operators-based approach, IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR can alleviate information loss and computational complexity. Numerical examples have validated the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

show abstract

Section: Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation (Erse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation (Erse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation (Erse)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evaluating Emergency Response Solutions for Sustainable Community Development by Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approaches: IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

TODIM method based on cumulative prospect theory for multiple attribute group decision‐making under 2‐tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy environment

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On the basis of previous scholars’ research, we improve the traditional TOmada de Decisão Interativa e Multicritério (TODIM) along with Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) under the 2‐tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets (2TLPFSs) in this article. First of all, we give some definitions of Pythagorean fuzzy sets, 2TLPFSs, and the 2‐tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted average as well as 2‐tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy weighted geometric operators. After that, according to the existing researches, we simply introduce the TODIM method and TODIM method under 2TLPFSs. Furthermore, we propose the TODIM method based on CPT (CPT–TODIM) for multiple attribute group decision‐making (MAGDM) with 2TLPFSs. Finally, a numerical example about company credit risk assessment is used to explain the new proposed method. Comparing with other methods, there is no doubt that this new method has superiority. To be exact, because the new method fully considers the mental factors of decision makers, it can better solve the uncertainty of MAGDM and improve the rationality of decision‐making.

show abstract

q‐Rung double hierarchy linguistic term set fuzzy AHP; applications in the security system threats features of social media platforms

Duan

Gulistan

Abbasi

et al. 2021

Int J of Intelligent Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this modern age, information technology has developed tremendously. This development becomes very fast as it is the best way to share information.Social media users' concerns about their privacy have spiked in recent years. Incidents of data breaches have alarmed many users and forced them to rethink their relationships to social media and the security of their personal information. There can be many risks to information sharing, which is considered an attack on software and information hacking. Today, the password has a threat to any security system. Hackers steal people's passwords and misuse them.Peoples are worried about hacking their information and data. In this paper, we present the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach under the environment of q-rung orthopair double hierarchy linguistic term set (q-RODHLTS) and its some fundamental operations. For this purpose, we use the q-RODHLAHP in the multi-attribute decisionmaking process. Examples of security systems are demonstrated to illustrate the validity of the proposed approach. Security has become a significant issue as information technology is spreading rapidly

show abstract

Evaluating emergency response capacity by fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach

Cited by 116 publications

References 21 publications

Evaluating Emergency Response Solutions for Sustainable Community Development by Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approaches: IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR

Evaluating Emergency Response Solutions for Sustainable Community Development by Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approaches: IVDHF-TOPSIS and IVDHF-VIKOR

TODIM method based on cumulative prospect theory for multiple attribute group decision‐making under 2‐tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy environment

q‐Rung double hierarchy linguistic term set fuzzy AHP; applications in the security system threats features of social media platforms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About