Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3202185.3202757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating elementary student interaction with ubiquitous touch projection technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [19] used an AR system to detect thermal leaks by providing visual data to avoid common accidents in the workplace; similarly, the projector unit headed towards the area of interest. For educational purposes, a famous example of using AR is the interactive board in classrooms [20], where it helps students to become more involved in the in-class activity and increase their attention. However, the projection-based interactive board usually suffers from tracking sensor occlusion and the projection beam's blockage problems.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Informative Augmented Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of [19] used an AR system to detect thermal leaks by providing visual data to avoid common accidents in the workplace; similarly, the projector unit headed towards the area of interest. For educational purposes, a famous example of using AR is the interactive board in classrooms [20], where it helps students to become more involved in the in-class activity and increase their attention. However, the projection-based interactive board usually suffers from tracking sensor occlusion and the projection beam's blockage problems.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Informative Augmented Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user is fully involved in the projection process to customize the projected screen's size and location; on the other hand, several systems remove this facility from the user by restricting the interaction area to a specific location and size due to the pre-setup requirements [10,15]. Some conventional projection-based interactive AR systems cannot serve for applications that demand extended indoor interactive spaces, flexible assigning for the interactive areas, and larger user's interactive envelope [20][21][22]. Nevertheless, thanks to our system's mobility and customization capability, normal indoor spaces can support diverse interactive tasks.…”
Section: Overall System Abilities and Candidate Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%