1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02026823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating dredging and offshore loading locations for U.S. coal exports using the local logistics system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the number of modules is fixed by constraint (), regardless of whether they are placed singly at different locations or in groups, implies that the cost is constant regardless of the size of the installation. More realistic economies of scale could be introduced by defining capacity based on a number of fixed facility sizes (such as small, medium, and large) rather than modular units, as in Osleeb et al (1986). The fixed cost of underground storage, for instance, would increase nonlinearly with scale.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the number of modules is fixed by constraint (), regardless of whether they are placed singly at different locations or in groups, implies that the cost is constant regardless of the size of the installation. More realistic economies of scale could be introduced by defining capacity based on a number of fixed facility sizes (such as small, medium, and large) rather than modular units, as in Osleeb et al (1986). The fixed cost of underground storage, for instance, would increase nonlinearly with scale.…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The y ijd variable indicates whether or not a pipeline of diameter d is built from i to j. The choice of several possible discrete pipeline diameters, each with its particular fixed cost and capacity, enables economies of scale to be represented in the model in a manner similar to how Osleeb et al (1986) modeled different sizes of coal port handling equipment. Constraints ( 2) and ( 3) require that if a pipeline is built, the CO 2 flow through the pipeline must be less than the maximum capacity and greater than the minimum capacity.…”
Section: Decision Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ben-Ayed et al (1992) developed a model for rural roads in developing countries with continuous link capacities based on incremental improvements, solved via bi-level linear programming. Osleeb et al (1986) used mixed-integer programming to choose among several projects at each coal port, each with unique ®xed and variable costs that imply a piecewise linear cost function with economies of scale. Di¨erent link capacities also arises in the context of airline networks, with economies of scale according to plane size (Kuby and Gray 1993;Branhart and Schneur 1996).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%