1996
DOI: 10.1016/1352-0237(95)00038-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating documents reference service and the implications for improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 However, June Parker's 1996 study indicated that reference questions were more successfully answered at a stand-alone government documents rather than a combined reference desk. 29 Indeed, this was a long-standing concern with documents/reference desk mergers. 30 A 1989 survey conducted by Philip Van De Voorde found that overall circulation of the documents collection went down as well as the overall quality of the reference service offered to patrons.…”
Section: Claudene Sproles and Anna Marie Johnsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 However, June Parker's 1996 study indicated that reference questions were more successfully answered at a stand-alone government documents rather than a combined reference desk. 29 Indeed, this was a long-standing concern with documents/reference desk mergers. 30 A 1989 survey conducted by Philip Van De Voorde found that overall circulation of the documents collection went down as well as the overall quality of the reference service offered to patrons.…”
Section: Claudene Sproles and Anna Marie Johnsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One evaluative study of reference services focused on the use of government documents at Joyner Library at East Carolina University. Parker (1996) sought to find out who uses government documents, why they are used and which categories of material are used the most. WOREP uses a two-part form—one part completed by the patron asking the question and the other by the library staff member answering the question.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%