Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-8-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods

Abstract: Background: The Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) and the Mental Health Component Summary score (MCS) derived from the Short Form 36 (SF-36) instrument are well validated and reliable scales. A drawback of their construction is that neither has a clinically validated cutpoint to define a case of common mental disorder (CMD). This paper aims to produce cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS by comparison with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
189
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
189
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…No consensus has been reached on what cut-off score should be used to indicate depression (Kavanaugh et al, 2006;Kelly et al, 2008;Mistry et al, 2007). Most recently, Kelly and colleagues used five statistical methods that yielded scores of 60, 68, and 76 (Kelly et al, 2008).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No consensus has been reached on what cut-off score should be used to indicate depression (Kavanaugh et al, 2006;Kelly et al, 2008;Mistry et al, 2007). Most recently, Kelly and colleagues used five statistical methods that yielded scores of 60, 68, and 76 (Kelly et al, 2008).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MHI-5 uses a six-point response scale from "All of the time" to "None of the time" (McHorney et al, 1992). Both versions have been validated for use with diverse populations and have adequate psychometric properties (Berwick et al, 1991;Kelly, Dunstan, Lloyd, & Fone, 2008;Leiferman, Ollendick, Kunkel, & Christie, 2005;McHorney & Ware, 1995;McHorney, Ware, Lu, & Sherbourne, 1994;McHorney, Ware, & Raczek, 1993; month. How much of the time have you 1) been a very nervous person?…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average MHI-5 score was 21.8 (SD, 4.9), with scores < 60 likely representing the presence of a mental disorder with a minimal misclassification rate. 17 The mean POMS-B score was In terms of a formal mental health history, patients frequently endorsed having been evaluated for or diagnosed with depression (32.0%), anxiety (29.5%), stress (26.2%), and grief (15.0%). Of participants, 22.2% had received active treatment of a mood disorder within the past 6 months.…”
Section: Psychological Comorbiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 MHI-5 scores < 60 were associated with a mental disorder with a minimal misclassification rate. 16,17 The Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) was a validated measure given in conjunction with the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) to assess disease burden among patients. 3 The Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Total Symptom Score (MPN TSS or MPN-10) is a compiled 10-item assessment of the most representative and pertinent of the MPN-SAF symptoms.…”
Section: Survey Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cut-off score of 60 was used to clasUnauthenticated Download Date | 12/16/16 1:18 PM sify moderate to poor mental health (e.g., Theunissen, Jansen, & van Gestel, 2011). A cut-off score of 60 produces the smallest error rate, as defined by yielding the highest sensitivity and specificity rates (Kelly, Dunstan, Lloyd, & Fone, 2008). MHI-5 has displayed satisfactory validity for measuring mood disorders and anxiety disorders in a general population sample using DSM-IV criteria as a reference (Rumpf, Meyer, Hapke, & John, 2001).…”
Section: Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%