2018
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Antimicrobial Use and Spectrum of Activity in Ontario Hospitals: Feasibility of a Multicentered Point Prevalence Study

Abstract: BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship, a key component of an overall strategy to address antimicrobial resistance, has been recognized as a global priority. The ability to track and benchmark antimicrobial use (AMU) is critical to advancing stewardship from an organizational and provincial perspective. As there are few comprehensive systems in Canada that allow for benchmarking, Public Health Ontario conducted a pilot in 2016/2017 to assess the feasibility of using a point prevalence methodology as the basis of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were higher than the NAPS in Australian hospitals (30.5%) [ 19 ]. A similar situation or higher rates of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis >24 h have been reported in other countries (range 52.8–77%) [ 11 , 12 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. A survey conducted among general surgeons found that failure to keep up to date, reliance on habit rather than on evidence-based practices, personal experience and preference, peer influence, and institutional norms affected their choice of duration of antimicrobials cover [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results were higher than the NAPS in Australian hospitals (30.5%) [ 19 ]. A similar situation or higher rates of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis >24 h have been reported in other countries (range 52.8–77%) [ 11 , 12 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. A survey conducted among general surgeons found that failure to keep up to date, reliance on habit rather than on evidence-based practices, personal experience and preference, peer influence, and institutional norms affected their choice of duration of antimicrobials cover [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This was also comparable to the average prevalence observed among hospitals in the neighbouring country, Singapore (51%) [ 8 ]. Figures for the prevalence of antimicrobial consumption to adult hospitalised patients in other PPS studies varied between different regions; 43% in Australia [ 9 ], 56% in China [ 10 ], 32.9% in Europe [ 11 ], 38% in Canada [ 12 ], and 34.4% from the reported data collected across 53 countries [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When possible, total consumption for antibiotics for systemic use (ATC J01 class) should be reported and further stratified by antibiotic classes (J01 subgroup) or individual agents. 15 , 21 , 22 , 40 , 48 Data stratification according to the new AWARE index, introduced by the WHO in the Essential Medicines List, 37 is an alternative to promote benchmarking. 45 , 53 Approaches that are more specific can be considered in the case of predefined outcome measures addressing specific syndromes and/or settings (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would help to identify recurrent problems with antimicrobial use at the institution and frames the problems that need to be addressed [44]. The antimicrobial stewardship efforts should focus on improving adherence to documentation standards, optimizing the use of antimicrobials, appropriateness of drug dosing, halting treatment of asymptomatic bacteria and microbes, and minimizing the length of surgical prophylaxis [45].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Stewardshipmentioning
confidence: 99%