2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijil.2018.089618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and comparing ten-year (2006-2015) research performance between Malaysian public and private higher learning institutions: a bibliometric approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we also performed SMA of the field in order to elucidate its cognitive and social framework [51]. Regarding this, several SMA tools have been developed and validated to analyze collaboration patterns among institutions [24,52] , identify growing scientific areas of interest [53] and optimize funding allocation in scientific research [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we also performed SMA of the field in order to elucidate its cognitive and social framework [51]. Regarding this, several SMA tools have been developed and validated to analyze collaboration patterns among institutions [24,52] , identify growing scientific areas of interest [53] and optimize funding allocation in scientific research [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where distinctions were made between the social sciences and humanities, SSCI journals were placed in a more prestigious position than A&HCI journals. Administrators' perception of SSCI having higher inclusion standards may due to the fact that SSCI indexes journals based on quantitative indicators like citation numbers, while journals indexed by A&HCI are handpicked by editors and indexing staff, rendering a degree of subjectivity (V.-H. Lee, Hew & Loke 2018). However, administrators may fail to acknowledge that such subjectivity is a result of the specific culture of HSS, which emphases citations and publication in non-journal formats; and this, in consequence, calls for discipline-specific evaluation criteria (Engels, Ossenblok, and Spruyt 2012;V.-H. Lee, Hew, and Loke 2018).…”
Section: The 'Matthew Effect' In Hss Publishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, five research universities were identified by the Ministry of Higher Education, and the USM is one of those, which was subsequently awarded the Accelerated Programme for Excellence (APEX) status (5). The research output is assessed through the Key Performance Indicators Monitoring System (KPI-MS), with the type of grants and publications acquired from ‘USM KPI-MS’.…”
Section: Years Of Research and Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%