2010
DOI: 10.1071/cp10019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating an active optical sensor for quantifying and mapping green herbage mass and growth in a perennial grass pasture

Abstract: Efficiently measuring and mapping green herbage mass using remote sensing devices offers substantial potential benefits for improved management of grazed pastures over space and time. Several techniques and instruments have been developed for estimating herbage mass, however, they face similar limitations in terms of their ability to distinguish green and senescent material and their use over large areas. In this study we explore the application of an active, near infrared and red reflectance sensor to quantif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the soybean experiment, the high weed control obtained since the low herbicide doses used did not provide the variability of weed leaf coverage necessary to obtain this information. The implementation of this methodology is derived from one of the main uses of reflectance sensors related to the prediction of nitrogen fertilization in the top dressing of corn, wheat, and barley (Grohs et al, 2009;Rambo et al, 2010) and for pasture utilization (Trotter et al, 2010). Similarly, the prediction of weed leaf coverage through the NDVI index was conducted on cotton with the WeedSeeker TM equipment, resulting in a linear model with a determination coefficient of 0.69 (Sui et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the soybean experiment, the high weed control obtained since the low herbicide doses used did not provide the variability of weed leaf coverage necessary to obtain this information. The implementation of this methodology is derived from one of the main uses of reflectance sensors related to the prediction of nitrogen fertilization in the top dressing of corn, wheat, and barley (Grohs et al, 2009;Rambo et al, 2010) and for pasture utilization (Trotter et al, 2010). Similarly, the prediction of weed leaf coverage through the NDVI index was conducted on cotton with the WeedSeeker TM equipment, resulting in a linear model with a determination coefficient of 0.69 (Sui et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem, a variety of other spatially-enabled, "on-the-go" pasture biomass measuring techniques have been developed. Trotter et al [9] provides a review of these techniques which include visual assessment, pasture height recording devices, weighted plate meters, combinations of height and weighted plate meters, electrical capacitance probes, pendulum sensors as well as active optical sensors (AOS). Each of these techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages, however common issues included limited accuracy when dealing with spatially-variable phenology, morphology, species composition and green vs. dry fraction, e.g., [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral reflectance indices that are calculated by measuring the reflectance of vegetation at certain wavelengths, (such as the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), simple ratio (SR), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) to name a few) have been used to successfully estimate the biomass content of vegetation, e.g., [9,[14][15][16][17][18]. In recent times, a certain class of sensors that have been used for estimating biomass in pastures are AOS [15,16,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of the above ground biomass (AGB, units g m −2 ) of grasslands is important for a number of applications including pasture management [1], wildlife habitat monitoring [2,3], fire management [4,5], carbon storage [6,7], and understanding the implications of biophysical and ecological processes that influence grass production [8,9]. Destructive methods of AGB estimation require cutting, drying, and weighing grass samples, which is time consuming, inefficient for large area application, and may preclude repeat temporal estimation as the grass is physically removed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%