2021
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abd3d1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating accuracy of four MODIS-derived burned area products for tropical peatland and non-peatland fires

Abstract: Satellite-based burned area products are accurate for many regions. However, only limited assessments exist for Indonesia despite extensive burning and globally important carbon emissions. We evaluated the accuracy of four MODIS-derived (moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer) burned area products (MCD45A1 collection 5.1, MCD64A1 (collection 5.1 and 6), FireCCI51), and their sensitivity to burned-area size and temporal window length used for detection. The products were compared to reference burned area… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detections made by moderate‐resolution global BA data sets such as MODIS have been evaluated for omission errors (false‐negatives) and commission errors (false‐positives), albeit not uniformly across the globe. Targeted evaluations have been conducted in specific regions (e.g., Chuvieco et al., 2008; D. Cheng et al., 2013; Hall et al., 2016; Libonati et al., 2015; Roy & Boschetti, 2009; Vetrita et al., 2021) and some global studies have evaluated the accuracy of MODIS BA detections using a stratified random sampling approach to select fires in a manner that equitably represents biomes and seasons (Boschetti et al., 2016, 2019; Padilla et al., 2014, 2015, 2017). For example, Boschetti et al.…”
Section: Technological Advances and Conceptual Foundations Of Fire Sc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detections made by moderate‐resolution global BA data sets such as MODIS have been evaluated for omission errors (false‐negatives) and commission errors (false‐positives), albeit not uniformly across the globe. Targeted evaluations have been conducted in specific regions (e.g., Chuvieco et al., 2008; D. Cheng et al., 2013; Hall et al., 2016; Libonati et al., 2015; Roy & Boschetti, 2009; Vetrita et al., 2021) and some global studies have evaluated the accuracy of MODIS BA detections using a stratified random sampling approach to select fires in a manner that equitably represents biomes and seasons (Boschetti et al., 2016, 2019; Padilla et al., 2014, 2015, 2017). For example, Boschetti et al.…”
Section: Technological Advances and Conceptual Foundations Of Fire Sc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted evaluations have been conducted in specific regions (e.g., Chuvieco et al, 2008;D. Cheng et al, 2013;Hall et al, 2016;Libonati et al, 2015;Roy & Boschetti, 2009;Vetrita et al, 2021) and some global studies have evaluated the accuracy of MODIS BA detections using a stratified random sampling approach to select fires in a manner that equitably represents biomes and seasons (Boschetti et al, 2016(Boschetti et al, , 2019Padilla et al, 2014Padilla et al, , 2015Padilla et al, , 2017. For example, Boschetti et al (2019) evaluated the MODIS BA product MCD64A1 and estimated commission and omission errors to be 40% and 73%, respectively, at the global scale.…”
Section: Expansion Of Earth Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MODIS-derived BA products have been utilized in several studies across different regions and ecosystems in recent years, with their spatial and temporal accuracy being thoroughly assessed. These studies focus on typical (tropical forests, savannas, grasslands) [6,25,29,30] or less fire-prone (boreal forests or tundra) ecosystems [31] with the time period of investigation commonly spanning, with few exceptions, few seasons as a result of the limited availability of higher-resolution reference datasets, especially when extensive spatial scales are considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study makes use of the MODIS FireCCI51 fire data (Chuvieco et al, 2018a ). This product has been extensively validated for wildfires and larger burns (Hall et al, 2021 ), is shown to have a higher detection of smaller fires (< 1 km 2 ) compared to other products (Katagis & Gitas, 2022 ), and has comparable accuracy in detecting tropical peatland fires (Vetrita et al, 2021 ). Despite this, limitations of the MODIS burned area data have been documented in the literature (Alves et al, 2018 ; Chuvieco et al, 2018b ; Ying et al, 2019 ), with omission errors up to 72% (Boschetti et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%