Evaluate the influence of panel composition on facial attractiveness

Maurya, Raj Kumar; Gupta, Ankur; Garg, Jaishree; Shukla, Chandresh

doi:10.4103/2321-3825.146361

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…NLA has been extensively studied in the orthodontic literature [11,[13][14][15][16][17] , and it is an important parameter while deciding the treatment plan. Fitzgerald et al [11] divided the NLA into the inclination of the upper lip and inclination of the lower nose and investigated their relation with sagittal and vertical facial parameters.…”

Section: Soft-tissue Nasion (N')mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Evaluation of Various Nasal Parameters in Different Malocclusion and Growth Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study

Bhardwaj

Maurya

Nehra

et al. 2018

J Indian Orthod Soc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate nasal parameters in Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion and its association with different growth patterns and gender. Materials and Methods: Pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of 120 Indian adults were selected from the archives for the study. Various hard-and soft-tissue parameters were traced on cephalogram. SNA, SNB, and ANB were used to distribute records in Class I, II, and III. GO-GN to sella-nasion was used to divide different growth patterns. The nasal parameters used were nasal length (N Lth), nasal depth, nasolabial angle (NLA), and lower nose to Frankfort horizontal (LNFH) plane angle. The group differences were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and independent sample t-test. Results: On the evaluation of nasal parameters in Class I, II, and III malocclusions, N Lth was found to be greater in Class III adult. Similarly, NLA and LNFH angle was significantly higher in adults with vertical growth pattern. However, no statistically significant difference was found between various nasal parameters in male and female adults (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The present study found that among the different malocclusion groups of Class I, II, and III, N Lth was found to be greater in Class III adults. Similarly, comparison of the overall sample for all nasal parameters within different growth pattern showed that NLA and LNFH angle was higher in adults with vertical growth pattern. However, there was no gender dimorphism found for nasal parameters.

show abstract

Section: Soft-tissue Nasion (N')mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Evaluation of Various Nasal Parameters in Different Malocclusion and Growth Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study

Bhardwaj

Maurya

Nehra

et al. 2018

J Indian Orthod Soc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cochrane et al, 21 O’Neil et al, 22 and Falkensammer et al 18 examined the effects of gender on esthetic perceptions, and resulted that the genders of the panel members did not affect their perceptions. Maurya et al 24 evaluated the influence of panel composition on the facial attractiveness of adolescents and there was no significant difference between the ratings of males and females. In this study, it was concluded that gender may not be a factor which influences the perspective of the scorers.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kiekens et al 8 found that older panel members had more positive evaluations of the boys than younger panel members did, and explained this in terms of the “age factor,” which posits that as people get older they become more accepting regarding facial esthetics. Maurya et al 24 founded that young laymen rated girls significantly more attractive than old laymen. Tole et al 23 concluded that the older assessors gave higher grades.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Perspectives of Orthodontists and Laypersons About the Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Facial Aesthetics of Young Turkish Patients

Fidancioglu¹,

Malkoç²,

Güler

2021

Journal of Advanced Oral Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To compare the perspective of orthodontists and laypersons on the effects of orthodontic treatment on facial aesthetics in young Classes I, II, and III Turkish patients. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 60 patients (30 males and 30 females, 9 to 17 years of age) was included using randomization in strata and then divided equally ( n = 15) into four groups according to the Angle classification. Photographs during frontal and lateral resting and also smiling were obtained from each patient before and after orthodontic treatment. A panel consisting 50 laypersons and 50 orthodontists was invited for the evaluation of the initial and final photos by using the visual analogue scale and a five-point scale to determine similarities and differences of their perspectives in the effects of orthodontic treatment on facial aesthetics. The data were analyzed by independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson’s correlation test. Results: The evaluation of facial aesthetics and treatment changes were not affected by the age and gender of the panel members ( P <.05). Angle Class III patients were given lower scores by both orthodontists ( P < .001) and laypersons ( P < .05), but no significant differences were found between any of other classes ( P >.05). Orthodontists reported greater improvement for Class III than in Class II Division 1 ( P < .05) however laypersons did not notice the changes after orthodontic treatment for any of Angle classes ( P >.05). Conclusion: Class III patients received lower scores for aesthetics from both panels. Laypersons may not be concerned about the effects of orthodontic treatment on facial aesthetics in patients with any Angle class. Orthodontists have seen more facial aesthetic changes after orthodontic treatment in Class III patients.

show abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis on Bolton’s ratios: Normal occlusion and malocclusion

Machado¹,

Botelho²,

Mascarenhas³

et al. 2019

J Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to seek and summarise the Bolton overall index (OI) and anterior index (AI) regarding normal occlusion and Angle’s malocclusion according to gender, and to assess if these indices support Bolton’s standards as general references. Methods: PubMed, LILACS, Embase, CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases were searched up to June 2019 (CRD42018088438). Non-randomised clinical studies, published in English and assessing Bolton’s OI and/or AI in normal occlusion and Angle’s malocclusion groups, were included. OI and AI means, sample size and SDs were collected. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess the risk of bias. Pairwise random-effects and multilevel Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to synthesise available data. Results: Fifty-three observational studies were included (11,411 participants; 3746 men, 4430 women; 15 studies lacked gender information). For normal occlusion, pooled estimates for OI and AI means were 91.78% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91.42–92.14; I2 = 92.87%) and 78.25% (95% CI = 77.87–78.62; I2 = 90.67%), respectively. We could identify in Angle’s Class III patients meaningful OI and AI mean deviations from normal occlusion (0.76, 95% credible interval [CrI] = 0.55–0.98 and 0.61, 95% CrI = 0.35–0.87, respectively), while in Class II patients we found a meaningful mean deviation from normal occlusion only for OI (−0.28, 95% CrI = −0.52–−0.05). Concerning gender impact, male patients presented higher OI (0.30, 95% CI = 0.00–0.59) and AI (0.41, 95% CI = 0.00–0.83) mean values than female patients in Class I. Conclusion: Normal occlusion OI and AI mean values differ from Bolton’s original values. Class II division 2, for OI mean values, and Class III, for both OI and AI, are proportionally larger than normal occlusion patients. Gender had almost no impact on teeth mesiodistal proportion.

show abstract

Evaluate the influence of panel composition on facial attractiveness

Cited by 3 publications

References 9 publications

Comparative Evaluation of Various Nasal Parameters in Different Malocclusion and Growth Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study

Comparative Evaluation of Various Nasal Parameters in Different Malocclusion and Growth Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study

Evaluation of the Perspectives of Orthodontists and Laypersons About the Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Facial Aesthetics of Young Turkish Patients

A systematic review and meta-analysis on Bolton’s ratios: Normal occlusion and malocclusion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About