Evaluasi Kesesuaian RKP dan RKPD 34 Provinsi terkait DAK Fisik Penugasan Bidang Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan 2019

Abstract

Development of the Environment and Forestry (LHK) is essentially carried out in order to increase the carrying capacity of land and the environment. In practice, national development in this field involves the central and regional governments in accordance with their authority and funding capacity. One of the efforts to reduce fiscal inequality and in the context of accelerating national development in the LHK sector, the central government is allocating the Special Allocation Fund (DAK) Physical Assignment. This transfer fund is needed because until 2019, efforts to improve the quality of the environment and the carrying capacity of watersheds and lakes are still not in line with national expectations. This paper attempts to analyze the planning and implementation of the DAK Physical Assignment 2019 from the evaluation of regional development perspective. This study uses a mixed method by using both secondary numerical data (planning documents, achievements and other relevant documents) and primers. Data collection was obtained through FGDs and questionnaires at sample locations. The gap analysis method is used to find gaps in centralregional planning and assess the appropriateness of the allocation of funding received by the province with the development targets outlined in the 2019 RKP. The results of the study found that the suitability of the RKP and RKPD 34 provinces in 2019 with the DAK Physical Assignment 2019 for the Environment and Forestry (LHK) is 22.3%. Allocation of Special Allocation Fund (DAK) Physical Assignment in the Field of Environment and Forestry 2019 does not yet reflect the watershed and lake priority areas as stipulated in Presidential Regulation No. 141/2018. There are still many Provinces that are in the watershed and priority lake but the budget allocation for Special Allocation Fund (DAK) Physical Assignment in the Field of Environment and Forestry is small. Based on the results of filling out the questionnaire, 71% of DAK has been effective in achieving goals / targets, while the remaining 29% is still not optimal. In its implementation, several obstacles were encountered that required further recommendations.

Analisis Permasalahan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan: Studi Kasus Perencanaan dan Pelaksanaan di Provinsi Papua Barat

“…Pada sisi pemerintah daerah, keterbatasan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) untuk membangun infrastruktur ini mendorong perlunya dukungan pendanaan dari pemerintah pusat. Salah satu mekanisme yang memungkinkan adalah melalui Dana Alokasi Khusus (Ibrahim & Abdul, 2019, GoI, 2014 Pambudi, 2020).…”

“…Perencanaan dan implementasi pembangunan infrastruktur jalan dengan anggaran DAK bukan tanpa kendala. Dana Alokasi Khusus dinilai belum efektif dalam implementasi karena sejak perencanaan anggaran hanya berbasis kinerja bukan pada pentingnya pemanfaatan setelah output tercapai (Pambudi, 2020;Yaqin & Herwanti, 2019). Evaluasi DAK fisik dan permasalahannya menjadi penting sebagai masukan untuk meningkatkan kualitas perencanaan pembangunan yang didanai DAK pada tahun-tahun setelahnya (Pambudi et al, 2021c;Sulaeman &Andriyanto, 2021) 1994).…”

Kendala Adaptasi Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Implementasi Dak Fisik Saat Pandemi Covid-19

“…Penularan virus COVID-19 yang bersifat cepat ini telah melumpuhkan sistem kesehatan di Indonesia (Apriliani & Khoinuurofik, 2020). Dalam perkembangannya, pandemi ini juga berdampak serius pada ekonomi Indonesia, dari mulai sektor transportasi, perdagangan, perhotelan sampai pariwisata (Pambudi, 2020). Pemerintah telah mengantisipasi penanganan wabah dengan meningkatkan sistem kesehatan serta pencegahan penularan dengan kebijakan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB).…”

The Challenges of Physical Special Allocation Fund (SAF) Planning for Sustainable Economic Infrastructure Provision

“…The fundamental problems in the regional development planning process are still top-down; patterns of thinking tend to be one-way and do not include strategic issues in the regional development planning process Aziz et al, 2013). On the other hand, regional development planning, including development using central government funding, should reflect the real conditions of a region (Pambudi, 2020b;Setianingsih et al, 2015).…”