2014
DOI: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol13-issue2-fulltext-340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluación de la empatía diádica: Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Índice de Reactividad Interpersonal en Parejas (IRIC-C) en contexto chileno

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We worked with the Argentinian adaptation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) by Davis (Minzi, 2007), an instrument which has been widely validated, not only in Argentina (Minzi, 2007) but also in other countries in the region (Fernández, Dufey, & Kramp, 2011; Guzmán et al, 2014; Quintana et al, 2013). It has four factors (the first two cognitive and the other two emotional) comprised of seven items each with adequate reliability indexes: Perspective-taking α .71; Empathetic concern α .56; Fantasy α .50; Personal unease α .60 (Minzi, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We worked with the Argentinian adaptation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) by Davis (Minzi, 2007), an instrument which has been widely validated, not only in Argentina (Minzi, 2007) but also in other countries in the region (Fernández, Dufey, & Kramp, 2011; Guzmán et al, 2014; Quintana et al, 2013). It has four factors (the first two cognitive and the other two emotional) comprised of seven items each with adequate reliability indexes: Perspective-taking α .71; Empathetic concern α .56; Fantasy α .50; Personal unease α .60 (Minzi, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, there has been some controversy regarding the definition of the construct; in some cases, the cognitive aspect is highlighted — specifically as the ability to adopt the other’s perspective (cognitive role-taking) — while in others the emotional component of empathy is foregrounded (identifying it as one of the positive emotions) (Fernández-Pinto, López-Pérez, & Márquez, 2008). However, recent studies revisit Davis’ stance (1994) and thus stress the importance of considering it a multidimensional construct which merges both aspects in an integrative vision that overcomes the previous dichotomy (Guzmán, Péloquin, Lafontaine, Trabucco, & Urzúa, 2014; Minzi, 2008; Vettorazzi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Contents Of Political Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples (IRIC; Péloquin & Lafontaine, 2010), which was validated for use in a Chilean population by Guzmán-González, Péloquin, Lafontaine, Trabucco, and Urzúa (2014), assesses two aspects of dyadic empathy: perspective taking (e.g., "I sometimes try to understand my partner better by imagining how things look from his/her perspective") and empathic concern (e.g., "I often have tender, concerned feelings for my partner when he/she is less fortunate than me"). The IRIC Chilean version comprises 13 items, which are evaluated on a 5-point scale, with responses ranging from 0 (does not describe me well) to 4 (describes me very well).…”
Section: Dyadic Empathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La empatía es una variable importante para el desarrollo y buen funcionamiento de las relaciones interpersonales (Guzmán González, Péloquin, Lafontaine, Trabucco & Urzúa, 2014). Si bien, en términos generales, la empatía se conceptualiza como la capacidad para comprender y experimentar los sentimientos de otros (Borrell i Carrió, 2004;Campbell & Babrow, 2004;Jolliffe & Farrington, 2006a), su estudio científico es de difícil abordaje debido, en buena parte, a la complejidad y multidimensionalidad del constructo (Fernández-Pinto, López-Pérez & Márquez, 2008;Rey, 2003).…”
unclassified