2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61756-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evalix: Classification and Prediction of Job Resource Consumption on HPC Platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the tradeoff among multi-path monolithic, two-level, lock-free and adaptive lock-free schedulers, we build a simulator that is based on a manycore system. This simulator is driven by synthetic workloads and its parameters are drawn from empirical workload distributions [1], [22], [30]. We use this to compare the behavior of multi-path monolithic, two-level, lock-free and adaptive lock-free scheduling models under the same conditions with identical workloads.…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To understand the tradeoff among multi-path monolithic, two-level, lock-free and adaptive lock-free schedulers, we build a simulator that is based on a manycore system. This simulator is driven by synthetic workloads and its parameters are drawn from empirical workload distributions [1], [22], [30]. We use this to compare the behavior of multi-path monolithic, two-level, lock-free and adaptive lock-free scheduling models under the same conditions with identical workloads.…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-level scheduling models assume that the tasks run on them are largely short-lived and relinquish resource frequently, a valid assumption for data-intensive workloads [21], [22]. However, because HPC workloads are dominated by compute-bound and long-running applications [1], [23], two-level scheduling models are not applicable for HPC nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations