2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evacuation plan of the city of almere: simulating the impact of driving behavior on evacuation clearance time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a number of studies using microscopic models, model parameters describing driving behaviour (such as headway, acceleration, reaction time) have been adjusted for the case of emergency evacuation (e.g., Tu et al 2010). Other than that, the model structure and parameter settings are typically not changed.…”
Section: Past and Current Evacuation Traffic Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of studies using microscopic models, model parameters describing driving behaviour (such as headway, acceleration, reaction time) have been adjusted for the case of emergency evacuation (e.g., Tu et al 2010). Other than that, the model structure and parameter settings are typically not changed.…”
Section: Past and Current Evacuation Traffic Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research reported in Tu et al (2010) it was for example assumed that drivers during an emergency situation express anxious behavior due to a mentally demanding situation. Tu et al (2010) subscribe to the assumptions made in Hamdar and Mahmassani (2008).…”
Section: Empirical Driving Behavior In Case Of Emergency Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tu et al (2010) subscribe to the assumptions made in Hamdar and Mahmassani (2008). In their research it is assumed that driving behavior under emergency situations ('extreme conditions') is characterized by an aggressive driving style.…”
Section: Empirical Driving Behavior In Case Of Emergency Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…及时有效的渔船回港避风是一个不容忽视的终于环节。 在应急疏散中涉及人员众多,难以在短时间内让 大规模群众完全听从指挥,极易出现个体按照自我意 愿自主行动的现象。因此在应急中应充分考虑个体行 动的意愿和偏好, Helbing 等人 (2000) [4] 在《 Nature》 上发表了研究成果,通过人群在恐慌状态下的行为构 建了恐慌状态下的人群逃散模型。Hao-Che Wu 等 (2012) [5] 在美国卡特里娜和丽塔飓风之后以调查问 卷的形式分析疏散时人们的路径选择行为。胡红等 (2007) [6] 根据将驾驶员对突发事件的心理行为反应 调查,对 GIPPS 跟驰模型进行了改进,建立了车速与 安全车距的关系模型。HuizhaoTu 等(2010) [7] 为研究 疏散人员的驾驶行为对整个疏散过程的作用,采用 Paramics 微观仿真软件对疏散人员的驾驶行为进行不 同情景的模拟仿真, 研究车辆加速度、 最大行驶速度、 平均距离、最小间距等因素对仿真结果的影响。Stern 等人(1989) [8] 利用行为模拟研究了不同类型家庭的 行动(外出、在家或睡觉)为整体预警信息传播的影 响。Uchida(2012) [9] 研究了在滑坡与预警中人群疏散 概率变化的现象。 考虑个体行为因素后,系统建模则多数采用基于 多主体仿真(Agent-Based Simulation:ABS)手段模拟 人群疏散行为。ABS 是一种微观仿真技术,仿真模型 中主体具有自主性和目标性,可以与环境和其他主体 进行交互(Railsback 等人,2006) [10] 。ABS 技术在应 急响应建模中已经有了广泛的应用,Chen 和 Zhan (2008) [11] 研究了城市交通疏散模型;Banerjee 等 ( 2009 ) [12] 针对大 规 模 拥 堵 问 题 建 立 仿真模型; Magesh 等(2012) [13] 提出基于 ABS 的预警信息扩散 下疏散仿真的框架,其中利用概率原理模拟了疏散中 警示邻居的行为。Hui 等人(2008) [14] 利用 …”
unclassified