2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70909-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoreti-cal wave base is also an important divider for sediments; above this depth, sediments are generally affected by erosion and transportation processes, while sediment accumulation dominates bottom areas below the theoretical wave base. The theoretical wave base is located at 41.1 m depth in the BB, at 42.5 m in the BS, at 43.8 m in the BP, at 43.8 m in the GF, and at 39.2 m in the GR [11]. It should be noted that the actual wave base could be located at quite different depths than these during extreme meteorological events such as major storms or long calm periods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The theoreti-cal wave base is also an important divider for sediments; above this depth, sediments are generally affected by erosion and transportation processes, while sediment accumulation dominates bottom areas below the theoretical wave base. The theoretical wave base is located at 41.1 m depth in the BB, at 42.5 m in the BS, at 43.8 m in the BP, at 43.8 m in the GF, and at 39.2 m in the GR [11]. It should be noted that the actual wave base could be located at quite different depths than these during extreme meteorological events such as major storms or long calm periods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…At present, there are no such models available for nitrogen but only for phosphorus [9,11]. Furthermore, the very fact that it has been possible to construct a general dynamic phosphorus model which does not take nitrogen loadings into account but which uses a unitary set of equations and model constants and gives good predictions of recent TP concentrations in all of the five subbasins investigated in this work contradicts hypothesis number six [11]. Finally, riverine nitrogen loads peaked in the 1980s [3] and have been stable since the mid-1990s [12] while a stable atmospheric nitrogen deposition has also been noted since the mid-1990s [26] which makes it difficult to present comprehensive empirical support for this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rating of trophic condition is based on Carlson and Håkansson trophic status classification criteria based on Secchi depth measurements and calculation of the Carlson index on Secchi distance [8][9][10][11]. Carlson trophic state index is used for comparison of different water bodies within an area as well as to compare trophic level changes over time [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Evaluate Of Trophic Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the lowest to the highest biologic activity: Oligotrophic (water clear and translucent, with low levels of nutrients and algae), Mesotrophic (green waters with easy, yet clear, the average amount of nutrients and algae), Eutrophic (water with a dark green color, high concentration of nutrients and algae), Hypertrophic (enriched in phosphorus and nitrogen, low phytoplankton development, polluted waters). Body of water with low value of trophic index may also be considered Hipertrophic [8,9]. Trophic state index (TSI) [10] is a different classification system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%