1990
DOI: 10.3109/00016489009124802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eustachian Tube Function in OME Patients with Cleft Palate: Special Reference to the Prognosis of Otitis Media with Effusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eustachian tube may be abnormally compliant, and may allow positive pressures in the nasopharynx to be transmitted to the middle ear, 192 causing nasopharyngeal pathogens to reflux into the middle ear. Cleft palate patients with OME have been shown to have abnormally compliant eustachian tubes 193,194 …”
Section: Why Is the Effusion Not Cleared Effectively?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eustachian tube may be abnormally compliant, and may allow positive pressures in the nasopharynx to be transmitted to the middle ear, 192 causing nasopharyngeal pathogens to reflux into the middle ear. Cleft palate patients with OME have been shown to have abnormally compliant eustachian tubes 193,194 …”
Section: Why Is the Effusion Not Cleared Effectively?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies of ET function in CP patients both before and after palate repair document an inability to open the ET during activities typically associated with mTVP contraction (e.g., swallowing), as well as other functional abnormalities (Bluestone, 1971; Bluestone et al, 1975; Doyle et al, 1980; Doyle et al, 1986; Tasaka et al, 1990; Takahashi et al, 1994). Because the two muscles intimately associated with the ET—the mTVP and the mLVP—have insertions within the palate, OME in CP patients has been attributed to ET dysfunction caused by abnormal interactions between those muscles and the ET (Huang et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, differences in middle ear outcomes may be expected with different palatoplasty techniques. However, eustachian tube dysfunction commonly persists after palatoplasty (Doyle et al, 1986; Dhillon, 1988; Tasaka et al, 1990; Robinson et al, 1992; Rynnel-Dagoo et al, 1992; Nunn et al, 1995). Past studies comparing palatoplasty techniques (Guneren et al, 2000; Kane et al, 2000) have generally failed to demonstrate a clear impact of different palatoplasty techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensor veli palatini function improves after palate repair, but this may never normalize (Doyle et al, 1986). Thus, COME remains a common problem after palatal surgery (Dhillon, 1988; Tasaka et al, 1990; Matsune et al, 1991b; Robinson et al, 1992; Rynnel-Dagoo et al, 1992; Nunn et al, 1995). Persistent eustachian tube dysfunction is also thought to be the primary factor responsible for the higher rates of more serious middle ear pathology observed in children with cleft palate, such as middle ear atelectasis, tympanic membrane perforation, and cholesteatoma (Dominguez and Harker, 1988; Goldman et al, 1993; Muntz, 1993; Smith et al, 1994; Nunn et al, 1995; Bluestone and Klein, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%