2000
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.110721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in the mediastinum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obtaining tissue from thoraco-abdominal lymph nodes is always difficult, but EUS-FNA has a greater yield and has been shown to be superior to percutaneous CT- and ultrasound-guided FNA [2,8,9]. There is evidence that EUS-FNA can supplant other more invasive diagnostic procedures, such as diagnostic mediastinoscopy, laparoscopy, thoracotomy and laparotomy [3,5,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obtaining tissue from thoraco-abdominal lymph nodes is always difficult, but EUS-FNA has a greater yield and has been shown to be superior to percutaneous CT- and ultrasound-guided FNA [2,8,9]. There is evidence that EUS-FNA can supplant other more invasive diagnostic procedures, such as diagnostic mediastinoscopy, laparoscopy, thoracotomy and laparotomy [3,5,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that EUS-FNA can supplant other more invasive diagnostic procedures, such as diagnostic mediastinoscopy, laparoscopy, thoracotomy and laparotomy [3,5,10]. Even very small lesions, as small as 5 mm in diameter, may be biopsied using EUS-FNA, which is not usually possible using other more widely available methods, including CT-guided biopsy or FNA [7,8]. EUS-FNA is much cheaper and a less invasive procedure than mediastinoscopy, which has traditionally been the gold standard for obtaining tissue from mediastinal nodes and has a very low rate of serious complications [1,2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS-FNA is very useful for intra-abdominal and some intrathoracic deep-seated lesions in close proximity to the gastrointestinal tract, and even for deep pelvic lesions sampled through the rectum that are relatively inaccessible by other standard image-guided techniques. Small lesions, as small as 5 mm in diameter, may be biopsied using EUS-FNA, which is not usually possible using other methods, including CT-guided biopsy or FNA [7,8]. In contrast to some of the traditional procedures, both EUS- and EBUS-FNA can be performed repeatedly for surveillance purposes.…”
Section: Diagnostic Utility Of Eus/ebus-fnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mediastinal lymph nodes in the subcarina, aorticopulmonary window and paraesophageal regions unreachable by mediastinoscopy, EUS-FNA is the least invasive means of biopsy. 1 The sensitivity and specificity of EUS-FNA vary but are generally favorable. 2,3 Some of the variation in diagnostic yield may be due to location of the node or mass, technical difficulty of the aspiration or level of experience of the endoscopist.…”
Section: Eus-fna Of Mediastinal Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%