European Monetary Union - a quantum leap

Abstract

The main statements contained in this paper can be summed up as follows: 1. The single market created a supranational economic area. It is only logical from an economic point of view that the single market should also give rise to a single currency. 2. In order to improve Europe's competitive position vis-à-vis Japan and the USA, the dollar must be rivalled by a European currency having equivalent clout. 3. The convergence criteria are economically justified. Stable prices, low interest rates, the reduction of dramatically inflated national debts and the elimination of competitive devaluations stimulate investment, jobs and growth. 4. The European Central Bank will assume the status of a European monetary government. If an equal effort is to be made to achieve employment and social policy objectives, then an economic government and a social government are also required. 5. The task of an economic government, in the form of a harmonised economic policy for the EU Member States, is to promote job-creating investment in new technologies and modern infrastructure projects. 6. The task of a social government, in the form of Union-wide coordinated trade union representation, is to safeguard social standards, participation rights and wage claims. 7. Only the trio of Monetary, Employment and Social Union make sense and entail genuine legitimacy. 8. In the light of the ongoing trend towards globalisation, the cost of failure and the associated re-establishment of putatively wholly sovereign nation states would be counter-productive for all countries in Europe. Résumé Les principaux messages de l' exposé se résument comme suit: 1. Le marché intérieur a créé un espace économique supranational. Que le marché unique se dote d'une monnaie unique correspond & a g r a v e ; une logique économique. -2. Pour mieux positionner l' Europe face & a g r a v e ; la concurrence du Japon et des USA, il faut opposer au dollar une monnaie européenne de même valeur. 3. Les critères de convergence ont leur justification économique. La stabilité des prix, la faiblesse des taux d'intérêt, la réduction des déficits publics devenus démesurés et la suppression des dévaluations sources de concurrence déloyale visent l' encouragement des investissements, de l' emploi et de la croissance. at OAKLAND UNIV on June 9, 2015 trs.sagepub.com Downloaded from 234 4. La banque centrale européenne aura le pouvoir d'un gouvernement monétaire européen. Pour que les objectifs d'emploi et de politique sociale acquièrent le même rang, il est indispensable d'avoir un gouvernement économique et un gouvernement social. 5. La mission du gouvernement économique, sous la forme d' une politique économique harmonisée entre les pays de l' UE, est de promouvoir les investissements créateurs d' emplois dans les nouvelles technologies et l...

The Europeanisation—or the Erosion—of Industrial Relations?

“…In addition, the various programmes covered by the EU structural funds have an important redistributive role, doing something to offset the dynamic of uneven development and counteracting a purely market logic of integration. Most recently, the pursuit of an employment strategy has resulted in decisions which could be dismissed as tokenistic but could equally be acclaimed as the foundations of a new, counter-deflationary European regime; while the introduction of the single currency has created new pressures towards the cross-national coordination of collective bargaining (Goetschy, 1994(Goetschy, , 1999Jacobi, 1996;Marginson and Sisson, 1998). …”

Europeização ou erosão das relações laborais?

“…Para além disto, os vários programas abrangidos pelos fundos estruturais da UE têm um importante papel redistributivo, contrariando em certa medida a lógica puramente mercantil da integração. Mais recentemente, a persecução de uma estratégia de emprego resultou em decisões que podem ser descartadas como meramente simbólicas, mas também aplaudidas como os alicerces de um novo regime europeu contra-deflacionário; ao mesmo tempo, a introdução da moeda única criou novas pressões para a coordenação transnacional das negociações colectivas (Goetschy, 1994(Goetschy, , 1999Jacobi, 1996;Marginson e Sisson, 1998).…”