2003
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1048516527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euler characteristics for Gaussian fields on manifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
130
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the basis of the work of Taylor (2001); Taylor and Adler (2003); Taylor (2006). It links the statistical information of the distribution used, the hitting set (via the GMFs) and the spatial structure of the correlated RF (via its covariance function second spectral moment) to the geometrical and topological characteristics of the excursion set (via LKCs).…”
Section: Expectation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the basis of the work of Taylor (2001); Taylor and Adler (2003); Taylor (2006). It links the statistical information of the distribution used, the hitting set (via the GMFs) and the spatial structure of the correlated RF (via its covariance function second spectral moment) to the geometrical and topological characteristics of the excursion set (via LKCs).…”
Section: Expectation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most conventional approaches for signal detection (and enhancement) in brain images are based on analytical formulae that describe the distribution of features in random fields (e.g., SPM; Friston et al, 1995). These are difficult to apply if data lie on curved manifolds such as the cortex (Goebel and Singer, 1999;Jones et al, 2000;Taylor and Adler, 2000), as the computed spatial autocorrelation of the surface data (1) depends on the local parameterization (or metric) of the surface, and (2) it may not be stationary (i.e., the same everywhere on the surface). To overcome this and to apply detection formulae for cortical signals that apply to stationary data (i.e., permutation tests on cluster extent or the Euler characteristics of suprathreshold statistics), a computational grid can be adapted to the roughness tensor of the data using a datadriven PDE (a process called statistical flattening; Worsley et al, 1999).…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Time Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, for the random field f defined on the surface, we calculated the expected value of the Euler Characteristic (EC) by appropriately smoothing the random field. The expected EC then determined the points on the surface where the z-statistic differed from zero at a prespecified level of significance (p = .05 − .0001), thereby identifying locations of statistically significant correlations of local morphology with IQ at the surface of each structure (Taylor & Adler, 2003).…”
Section: Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%