2020
DOI: 10.3917/books.112.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eugene Thacker : « Le suicide, c’est de l’optimisme »

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, and at odds with both posthumanist framings and the inspiration found within the inhuman or counterhuman, an unhuman approach would banish the perspective of the human altogether. Within such an unhuman conception of life, the human loses its salience as site of meaning in the face of the overwhelming indifference of the cosmos (Thacker, 2018). An unhuman politics would not seek recourse within a dialectical move that would abolish one conception of the human in order to replace it with another, however extended, but would attempt to strike more deeply at the lure of humanisation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Post- In- Counter- Un-?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, and at odds with both posthumanist framings and the inspiration found within the inhuman or counterhuman, an unhuman approach would banish the perspective of the human altogether. Within such an unhuman conception of life, the human loses its salience as site of meaning in the face of the overwhelming indifference of the cosmos (Thacker, 2018). An unhuman politics would not seek recourse within a dialectical move that would abolish one conception of the human in order to replace it with another, however extended, but would attempt to strike more deeply at the lure of humanisation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Post- In- Counter- Un-?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the topic of this article, the key point lies in the mutation that, according to Thacker, the concept of monstrosity experienced as a result of the work of Lovecraft and weird fiction. Thacker (2011) claims that before Lovecraft the monstrous was always seen "as an aberration (and abomination) of nature" (107), that is to say, as an "unnatural" mixture of physical, corporeal, and theopolitical categories that destroyed the order and hierarchy of bodies (physical, social, and theopolitical) and transformed them into an indeterminate, formless flow.…”
Section: The Monstrosity Of Thought and The Reification Of H P Lovecraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical apophatic approach in theology does not distinguish between the degrees of darkness involved in knowing the divine. Contemporary philosopher of horror Eugene Thacker analyzed the concept of divine darkness in the texts of the Areopagite, Meister Eckhart, Angela of Foligno, the anonymous treatise "Cloud of Contemplation", John of the Cross, and Georges Bataille and distinguished three types of darkness that theologians and mystics deal with (Thacker 2015).…”
Section: Dark Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%