Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 1996
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.1996.546045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euclidean reconstruction from constant intrinsic parameters

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[22,9]) are based implicitly on these constraints, parametrized by K or § and by something equivalent 4 to ¤ or A . All of these methods seem to work well provided the intrinsic degeneracies of the autocalibration problem [18] are avoided.…”
Section: Autocalibration For Non-planar Scenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[22,9]) are based implicitly on these constraints, parametrized by K or § and by something equivalent 4 to ¤ or A . All of these methods seem to work well provided the intrinsic degeneracies of the autocalibration problem [18] are avoided.…”
Section: Autocalibration For Non-planar Scenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartley [6] has given a particularly simple internal calibration method for the case of a single camera whose translation is known to be negligible compared to the distances of some identifiable (real or synthetic) points in the scene, and Faugeras [2] has elaborated a 'stratification' paradigm for autocalibration based on this. The numerical conditioning of classical autocalibration is historically delicate, although recent algorithms have improved the situation significantly [9,15,22]. The main problem is that classical autocalibration has some restrictive intrinsic degeneracies -classes of motion for which no algorithm can recover a full unique solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Direct methods seek to compute a metric reconstruction by estimating the absolute conic. This is encoded conveniently in the dual quadric formulation of autocalibration (Heyden and Åström 1996;Triggs 1997), whereby an eigenvalue decomposition of the estimated dual quadric yields the homography that relates the projective reconstruction to Euclidean. Linear methods (Pollefeys et al 1998) as well as more elaborate SQP based optimization approaches (Triggs 1997) have been proposed to estimate the dual quadric, but perform poorly with noisy data.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%