2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45129-3_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Euclidean Fitting Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were produced using Euclidean [30] or least squares [29] fitting for initial geometric completion. The original sample surface was oversampled once, triangulation utilised the Cocone algorithm [31,32] and Mersenne twister [35] provided the random source.…”
Section: Surface Relief Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were produced using Euclidean [30] or least squares [29] fitting for initial geometric completion. The original sample surface was oversampled once, triangulation utilised the Cocone algorithm [31,32] and Mersenne twister [35] provided the random source.…”
Section: Surface Relief Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-processing stage estimates the underlying geometric surface model for the original scene portion [29,30] from which a set of displacement vectors, − → D(i), and a corrected surface normal, n i , for each point i can be derived (see Fig. 5).…”
Section: D Non-parametric Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extract the geometric texture (localised surface relief) from the original surface mesh using localised surface fitting [4] to recover an orthogonal 3D displacement map for the sample surface.…”
Section: Texture Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Closed forms exist for planes, elliptical cylinders and cones, which are a very practical subset of the quadric surfaces.) Recently we have reinvestigated this question because of the recent dramatic increase in computational power [17,16]. As well as exposing the great difference in fit quality, we have investigated the computational costs.…”
Section: Euclidean Distance Is Better and Fastmentioning
confidence: 99%