While formally founded on a variety of values and rules, the enlargement of
the European Union (EU) has also been consistently influenced by
geopolitical considerations, including within the Western Balkans (WB). The
author particularly focuses on the Macedonian case in this regard, observing
it in the context of the enlargement policy?s diminished credibility, the
lack of progress towards fulfilling membership criteria, and more recently,
the complications caused by Russia?s invasion of Ukraine. Apart from the
veto imposed by Greece due to the naming dispute (which began in 2005),
Skopje?s progress towards EU accession was further hindered by additional
challenges related to democratic regression, state capture, and corruption.
However, even the change of government and the subsequent conclusion of the
Prespa Agreement with Athens in 2018 failed to result in the initiation of
EU accession negotiations, which were initially blocked by France and later
by Bulgaria. Meanwhile, concerns regarding the high degree of corruption
persisted, while Bulgarian bilateral demands became integrated into the
broader EU expectations from Skopje. The author concludes that the
Macedonian case is characterized by a significant degree of bilateral and
geopolitical considerations, further undermining the legitimacy and
objectives of the enlargement policy.