2014
DOI: 10.1037/cep0000006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Étude du biais d’attention sélective envers les stimuli menaçants et sécurisants dans l’anxiété-trait : Considération du décours temporel.

Abstract: Cette étude explore le décours temporel du traitement attentionnel des stimuli menaçants et sécurisants chez des individus « haut trait anxieux » (HTA) et « bas trait anxieux » (BTA). Les individus HTA et BTA ont répondu à une tâche de détection de sonde (dote probe task) dans laquelle les durées de présentation des stimuli (c.-à-d., des mots) étaient de 100, 500 ou 1250 ms. Les résultats indiquent que les individus HTA diffèrent des BTA uniquement dans le désengagement de l'information menaçante à 1250 ms. Le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There may be an increase in flexibility in the treatment of information, with a possible reduction in the negative feeling of being criticized associated with critical faces-and therefore a reduced need to look away from critical faces. The fact that the imagery had an effect only when it was presented for 1200 ms may indicate a top-down attentional control mechanism (Corbetta & Shulman, 2002, Desimone & Duncan, 1995Leleu, Douilliez, & Rusinek, 2013). This result is coherent with the motivational dimension of compassion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…There may be an increase in flexibility in the treatment of information, with a possible reduction in the negative feeling of being criticized associated with critical faces-and therefore a reduced need to look away from critical faces. The fact that the imagery had an effect only when it was presented for 1200 ms may indicate a top-down attentional control mechanism (Corbetta & Shulman, 2002, Desimone & Duncan, 1995Leleu, Douilliez, & Rusinek, 2013). This result is coherent with the motivational dimension of compassion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%