2003
DOI: 10.3917/th.662.0101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Étude clinique d'une activité collaborative : la conception d'un artefact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Duboscq and Clot (2010), who pose a functional relation between dialog and action (p. 255), previously used similar methodological instruments in the context of the study of building construction activity. They conducted a conversation analysis of cross self-confrontation data (see also the work of Brassac and Gregori, 2003, using discourse analysis and conversation analysis). Mondada (2012) reminds us that “from its very beginnings, Conversation analysis has been a pioneering movement that has explicitly recognized the use of recorded data” (p. 52).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duboscq and Clot (2010), who pose a functional relation between dialog and action (p. 255), previously used similar methodological instruments in the context of the study of building construction activity. They conducted a conversation analysis of cross self-confrontation data (see also the work of Brassac and Gregori, 2003, using discourse analysis and conversation analysis). Mondada (2012) reminds us that “from its very beginnings, Conversation analysis has been a pioneering movement that has explicitly recognized the use of recorded data” (p. 52).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedural texts and technical writings, as 'language, action and cognition' (Pascual et al 1997), have been studied by psychologists and linguists (Heurley 1997, Ganier 2004 Most studies on collaborative writing agree that it involves a series of writing phases and communication phases, i.e. The collective design of a manufactured object (Brassac and Grégori 2003) or a graphic representation (Brassac and Le Ber 2005) is based on discursive productions that are necessarily subject to substantial debate. To compose the joint text, each co-writer progresses in accordance with her perceptions of the actions of the others.…”
Section: Activity Observed: Joint Mediated Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cette méthode, malgré ses limitations, nous permet de rassembler un maximum de données durant une fenêtre temporelle d'intervention relativement limitée. Son caractère qualitatif permet de prendre en compte certains « sauts » de conception, isolés et très courts mais porteurs d'une signification primordiale pour la compréhension du processus et qui seraient erronément mis au second plan au travers d'une analyse plus quantitative, comme le soulignent Brassac & Grégori [3]. Elle nous permet également d'éviter les limitations d'une expérimentation moins réaliste en laboratoire ou les gênes provoquées par un protocole « think aloud ».…”
Section: Lʼintervention In Situ Et Le Traitement Des Donneesunclassified