1965
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-196506000-00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Etiology of Primary Atypical Pneumonia in a Military Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the present cases (4,5,8, and 9) bear out this observation, be¬ cause no antibody was detectable in a serum speci¬ men drawn two weeks after the onset of illness. This finding is in sharp contrast to the usual rapid rise of virus antibody levels after respiratory illness.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Four of the present cases (4,5,8, and 9) bear out this observation, be¬ cause no antibody was detectable in a serum speci¬ men drawn two weeks after the onset of illness. This finding is in sharp contrast to the usual rapid rise of virus antibody levels after respiratory illness.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Mycoplasma pneumoniae is commonly associated with ARD and pneumonia outbreaks among civilians, usually children and young adults (5), and has been identified in pneumonia outbreaks among crowded military recruit populations (8). M. pneumoniae spreads through close contact with expired respiratory secretions (droplets), like influenza virus, but has a long incubation period (6 to 32 days [10]) and a resulting tendency to generate long, slow-spreading epidemics (7,22) which may be difficult to recognize and control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that simultaneous infections with adenovirus and M pneumoniae are very rare even when the incidence of both infections in a given community is high. 9 Specific therapy is not available for adenovirus respiratory disease and, unlike influenzal pneumo¬ nia, secondary bacterial infection is very rare.1 Ste¬ roids have not been effective in influenzal pneu¬ monia,10 and their effect in adenovirus disease has not been evaluated and may easily cause harm. The early use of tracheostomy and direct instilla¬ tion of mucoiytic or proteolytic enzymes might re¬ verse an otherwise downhill course in severe bronchiolar disease.1'…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%