1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02866716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
157
0
47

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
157
0
47
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, for types C and D, women mentioned more species than men. These gender differences were observed elsewhere (Rossato et al 1999;Voeks & Leony 2004;Lawrence et al 2005) and reflect the lower mobility of women when compared to men. Women are more restricted to the domestic environment, and have a profound knowledge of the local pharmacopoeias based on herbs and cultivated plants near residences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, for types C and D, women mentioned more species than men. These gender differences were observed elsewhere (Rossato et al 1999;Voeks & Leony 2004;Lawrence et al 2005) and reflect the lower mobility of women when compared to men. Women are more restricted to the domestic environment, and have a profound knowledge of the local pharmacopoeias based on herbs and cultivated plants near residences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Focusing on this relationship between people and plants (Schultes & Reis 1995;Minnis 2000), ethnobotanical studies in Brazilian Atlantic Forest have grown in the last decade. Instead of essentially descriptive studies, quantitative approaches have been developed and applied, such as in the case of ethnobotany of native inhabitants of the Atlantic coast -the caiçaras Figueiredo et al 1993;Rossato et al 1999;Hanazaki et al 2000;Peroni & Hanazaki 2002). The paramount importance of these studies is associated with the presence of human settlements near areas topped for conservation priorities, especially when some local practices, knowledge, and skills are valued for conservation purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use value (UV) of animal species mentioned is calculated with the formula (modified from Rossato et al, 1999) UV ¼ P U=n, where UV ¼ index of the species' use value; U ¼ number of mentions per ethnoespecies; n ¼ number of respondents. This formula was used to identify the most important species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated, for each species and use category, respectively, their use value through the formulas UV = ΣUi/n and UVc = ΣUV/nc, described by Rossato et al (1999), where Ui = number of uses cited by each informant, n = total number of informants, UVc = use value of each species in the category, and nc = number of species in the category.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ethnobotanical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%