Ethnicity and Power in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do Colonial Institutions Still Matter?

Abstract

It has been sixty years since the first sub-Saharan nation declared independence. Over the past three decades, the region has undergone significant changes. Though few, if any, would question that colonial histories shaped African societies, it is unclear to what extent these legacies continue to be relevant to contemporary inter-group relations. Does it still make sense to speak about colonial legacies? And if so, which ones? This article explores these questions by examining whether ethnic groups who were privileged during the colonial period are more likely to hold political power decades later. To do so, I conduct a multiple case study analysis of twenty-five sub-Saharan countries from which I create an original dataset of how ethnic groups were positioned during the latter stages of colonialism. With these data, I run auto-regressive logistical models correlating former colonial position to executive power since independence. I find that many of the assumptions made in the scholarship about the importance of colonial privilege are not supported by these models. However, colonial institutional legacies may still help us understand inter-group dynamics and be the source of contemporary political grievances.

Perpetrator, facilitator, resister: a framework for studying state roles in genocide

“…In some ways, the process followed by Rwanda is a model for other states emerging from ethnic Rabinowitz 2020. conflict-but this too leaves us with a question. If the state is capable of creating justice processes in the wake of a genocide, why did it not take action during the worst moments of the crisis?…”