Ethnic Riots and Prosocial Behavior: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan

Abstract

Do ethnic riots affect prosocial behavior? A common view among scholars of ethnic violence is that riots increase cooperation within the warring groups, while cooperation across groups is reduced. We revisit this hypothesis by studying the aftermath of the 2010 Osh riot in Kyrgyzstan, which saw Kyrgyz from outside the city kill over 400 Uzbeks. We implement a representative survey, which includes unobtrusive experimental measures of prosocial behavior. Our causal identification strategy exploits variation in the distance of neighborhoods to armored military vehicles, which were instrumental in orchestrating the riot. We find that victimized neighborhoods show substantially lower levels of prosocial behavior. Importantly, we demonstrate that the reduction is similarly stark both within and across groups. Using qualitative interviews, we parse out two mechanisms that help explain the surprising reduction in ingroup prosociality: Victimized Uzbeks felt abandoned by their coethnics, and variation in victimization created a feeling of suspicion.

The Opinion-Mobilizing Effect of Social Protest against Police Violence: Evidence from the 2020 George Floyd Protests

“…Finally, our use of the Floyd protests to study the effect of social protest is consistent with the growing case-driven literature in political science using unique or extreme events to gain insight about the effect of broad categories of events, such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill to study environmental disasters (Bishop 2014), September 11 to study terrorism (Huddy et al 2005), the 2008 Financial Crisis to study economic recessions (Margalit 2013), the Syrian refugee crisis to study human migration (Hangartner et al 2019), and COVID-19 to study public-health crises (Warshaw, Vavreck, and Baxter-King 2020). Focusing specifically on social protest, over half a dozen articles concentrate on a single unique protest event-the 2006 Immigration Rallies (e.g., Barreto et al 2009;Branton et al 2015;Wallace, Zepeda-Millán, and Jones-Correa 2014)-and notable other works use extreme episodes of ethnic uprising (Enos, Kaufman, and Sands 2019;Hager, Krakowski, and Schaub 2019).…”

Riots and social capital in urban India

“…It is possible that people are suspicious of others in the aftermath of riots and thus try to minimize daily face-to-face exchanges. Increase in suspicion against close neighbours has been reported in other riot instances (Hager et al 2019) and in civil war contexts (Kalyvas 2006;Cassar et al 2013). It is also possible that the reduction in face-to-face interactions may reflect discontent with others in the neighbourhood and even punishment and ostracizing of neighbours that may be blamed for prior exposure to riots (Petersen 2002).…”

“…The paper extends this literature to analyze the role of low-intensity violence (in the form of riots). A similar analysis is done in Hager et al (2019), who focus on one riot that took place between two ethnic groups in the city of Osh in Kyrgyzstan. Our paper examines exposure of households to riots across time using a representative survey of informal settlements in a country (India) where riots are endemic to social, economic, and political life.…”

Does State Repression Spark Protests? Evidence from Secret Police Surveillance in Communist Poland

“…Third, surveillance creates an atmosphere of suspicion (cf. Hager, Krakowski, and Schaub 2019). Lichter, Löffler, and Siegloch (2021), for example, find that surveillance in East Germany reduced trust toward other citizens.…”