1988
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2<261::aid-jclp2270440228>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethnic and sex differences on the test of Nonverbal intelligence, quick test of intelligence, and Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised

Abstract: This study investigated the performance of 89 students on the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence, Quick Test, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children‐Revised IQ scores for ethnic and sex differences. The sample consisted of 61 males, 28 females (37 Black, 52 White). A two‐way analysis of variance and the new Duncan's Multiple Range Test were used to identify significant differences between the mean scores. The findings did not indicate any significant differences between the IQ scores with regard to ethnicity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normed Quick Test has an average normed score of 100 (standard deviation [ SD ] = 10) and in the current sample M = 87 (control: M = 90; maltreated: M = 84; Perez & Widom, 1994). The normative sample was stratified across socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds and has been successfully used with ethnically diverse samples (Vance, Hankins, & Brown, 1988). Quick Test scores correlate highly with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) full scale and verbal ( r = .79 to .86) IQs (Dizzone & Davis, 1973) and have shown good reliability and validity (Joesting & Joesting, 1972; Zagar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normed Quick Test has an average normed score of 100 (standard deviation [ SD ] = 10) and in the current sample M = 87 (control: M = 90; maltreated: M = 84; Perez & Widom, 1994). The normative sample was stratified across socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds and has been successfully used with ethnically diverse samples (Vance, Hankins, & Brown, 1988). Quick Test scores correlate highly with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) full scale and verbal ( r = .79 to .86) IQs (Dizzone & Davis, 1973) and have shown good reliability and validity (Joesting & Joesting, 1972; Zagar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quick test scores correlate highly with WAIS (Wechsler adult intelligence scale) full scale (.79–.80) and verbal (.79–.86) IQ scores (Dizzone & Davis, 1973). The Quick test has been used with a variety of subject populations and seems resistant to the type of decrement in performance on intelligence test tasks often associated with psychopathology (Dizzone & Davis, 1973; Gendreau, Gendreau & Roach, 1973; Sinnett, Holen, & Davie, 1988; Vance, Hankins, & Brown, 1988; Vance, Hankins & Reynolds, 1988). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of &dquo;comparable numbers of information processing modules&dquo; in the cerebral cortices of males and females was proposed based on the demonstration of comparable performance on intelligence tests by normal male and female children and adults. [21][22][23][24][25] This equality is based on the premise that the female cortex is more convoluted, with higher neuronal densities, than the male cortex to compensate for the larger male brain size (discussed by Willerman et aI26). However, such a concept's structural basis might need modification since the present data show higher neuronal densities in males, not females.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%