2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-313x.2006.00573.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics of international clinical research collaboration — the experience of AlloStem

Abstract: This paper examines the ethics of international clinical collaboration in stem cell research by focusing on the AlloStem project. AlloStem is an international research programme, financed by the European Union under the Sixth Framework Programme, with the aim of advancing the use of stem cells in treating leukaemia and other haematological diseases. Several areas of ethical importance are explored. Research justification and the need to consider both deontological and teleological aspects are examined. Ethical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another area raised by the EC is the ethical importance of disseminating research findings, an important role for high-quality international journals. 24 Critical assessment of clinical investigations is essential for practising clinicians to maintain professional competence throughout their careers. This emphasizes the importance of communicating research findings in a way that is clear and comprehensible to clinicians and allows them to assess relevance to their own clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another area raised by the EC is the ethical importance of disseminating research findings, an important role for high-quality international journals. 24 Critical assessment of clinical investigations is essential for practising clinicians to maintain professional competence throughout their careers. This emphasizes the importance of communicating research findings in a way that is clear and comprehensible to clinicians and allows them to assess relevance to their own clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%