2011
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590186.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics and Organizational Leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the negative reaction is mitigated by speech and decision disclosures. Therefore, the results reveal that the stakeholders believe the causal relationship between speech, decision and action, because the speech and decision disclosures of digital transformation are correlated with the high possibility of obtaining "positive attitudes" of stakeholders, and the significant correlation between speech disclosure and negative reaction can explain that such speech disclosure is consistent with social expectations [38]. Therefore, stakeholders are less likely to criticize the wishes of everyone in society if the enterprise's speeches or decisions on digital transformation conform to social norms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, the negative reaction is mitigated by speech and decision disclosures. Therefore, the results reveal that the stakeholders believe the causal relationship between speech, decision and action, because the speech and decision disclosures of digital transformation are correlated with the high possibility of obtaining "positive attitudes" of stakeholders, and the significant correlation between speech disclosure and negative reaction can explain that such speech disclosure is consistent with social expectations [38]. Therefore, stakeholders are less likely to criticize the wishes of everyone in society if the enterprise's speeches or decisions on digital transformation conform to social norms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The normative model of ethical leadership evaluation consists of five subcomponents: society expectations, organisational values, norms and beliefs, outcomes, society evaluation and reconnection. This model is dynamic by its nature; it presupposes business ethics to be continuous and iterative process (Fryer 2011). Still, the most important for our current research is the ESLS elaborated by Reed, Vidaver-Cohen and Colwell (Reed et al 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether or not such exceptional (and enviable) people fit into hierarchical organizational arrangements is not altogether clear. While some expect leaders to have managerial positions and just be a better kind of manager (Fryer 2011), others see leaders as necessary complements to managers. Leaders become necessary, they argue, because in a globalized society change is imperative and inescapable (Kotter 1990).…”
Section: The Idea Of Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%