2008
DOI: 10.1177/003335490812300102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Obligations of Physicians Participating in Public Health Quarantine and Isolation Measures

Abstract: SYNOPSISIn dealing with outbreaks of communicable diseases, the medical profession should work with public health authorities to promote the use of interventions that achieve desired public health outcomes with minimal infringement upon individual liberties. This article endeavors to help physicians manage their dual responsibilities to their patients and to their communities when participating in appropriate quarantine and isolation measures. In implementing such measures, individual physicians should take ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…66 Indeed, it is widely acknowledged that clinicians' responsibilities in public health contexts include discussion with patients to explain the risks to the public that arise from non-compliance with medical recommendations. 67 Where patients' requests or decisions about treatment implicate cost concerns, physicians might also exercise their ethical responsibility to promote justice by raising issues of resource stewardship with patients. The Choosing Wisely campaign explicitly recognizes the value of such conversations, and many commentators have suggested similar discussions in the context of marginally beneficial diagnostic and treatment techniques.…”
Section: The Argument From Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…66 Indeed, it is widely acknowledged that clinicians' responsibilities in public health contexts include discussion with patients to explain the risks to the public that arise from non-compliance with medical recommendations. 67 Where patients' requests or decisions about treatment implicate cost concerns, physicians might also exercise their ethical responsibility to promote justice by raising issues of resource stewardship with patients. The Choosing Wisely campaign explicitly recognizes the value of such conversations, and many commentators have suggested similar discussions in the context of marginally beneficial diagnostic and treatment techniques.…”
Section: The Argument From Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…]” 66 Indeed, it is widely acknowledged that clinicians' responsibilities in public health contexts include discussion with patients to explain the risks to the public that arise from non-compliance with medical recommendations. 67…”
Section: Engaging Patients In Conversations About Societal Stewardshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 140 ] The use of quarantine and isolation of the infectious individual was a basic pillar of public health in seaports in centuries past. [ 141 ] However, its use as an effective tool since the latter part of the twentieth century has come into question. There is probably less resistance by professionals and politicians in this Ebola epidemic to the isolation of infected patients, as compared to the use of quarantine for healthy exposed individuals, although it must be acknowledged that isolation itself can be an emotionally traumatic experience.…”
Section: Quarantine and Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation and home care are actions that must be taken to control the spread of a pandemic. However, in areas with widespread outbreaks, healthcare facilities find it challenging to offer proper isolation and conduct monitoring of all affected [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. One effective way of monitoring and providing vital healthcare services to the isolated, without exposing additional individuals to the risk of infection, is through remote communication [ 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%