1980
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical issues in the use of control groups

Abstract: Is it ethical to select clients at random for a beneficial social service, then deny the benefits to a control group for the sake of science?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants were not exposed to the intervention because of limited resources and rigorous process involved in working with children's cognition and behaviours. [ 79 ] On the other hand, the eligible participants were treated using CBPT-programme and implemented by experts in cognitive behavioural approaches. The CBPT-group members were subdivided into four groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The participants were not exposed to the intervention because of limited resources and rigorous process involved in working with children's cognition and behaviours. [ 79 ] On the other hand, the eligible participants were treated using CBPT-programme and implemented by experts in cognitive behavioural approaches. The CBPT-group members were subdivided into four groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledged that waitlisted control group participants deserve to be given the intervention but they were not given such opportunity [78] is a limitation to this study. The participants were not exposed to the intervention because of limited resources and rigorous process involved in working with children's cognition and behaviours [79] . On the other hand, the eligible participants were treated using CBPT-programme and implemented by experts in cognitive behavioural approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an exploratory study, the current research did not involve a control group for comparison, though it did involve both pre- and post-trail qualitative data being collected from participants and analysed for changes, as described in previous sections. There is some debate on the issues around control groups (Boruch 1975; Conner 1980), and there are questions about student equity if some groups are not exposed to potentially useful new technological approaches. In any case, this study did not set out to compare AR with non-AR pedagogies; nevertheless, the lack of a control group may be perceived as a limitation and, if deemed appropriate, it is an area that could be addressed in other future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-designed trials are a vital tool in building the evidence, however, including controls can sometimes be challenging. Achieving matching in samples when there are multiple factors to consider, such as type and severity of cleft, speech characteristics, surgical repair, hearing status and medical history is difficult (Conner, 1980). The implementation of designs such as cohort study design can overcome these barriers but in order to control for the variables mentioned, large samples and multi-site studies would be needed.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%