Ethical issues in participatory action research

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe the ethical issues arising out of participatory action research (PAR), on the basis of both an empirical study and the research literature, and to discuss how to deal with these issues. The data consist of the experiences and results of three phases of PAR relating to orthopaedic patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the analysis of 20 articles on the ethics of action research. As a result, the following ethical issues and the ways to treat them were discussed: informed consent, confidentiality and anonymity, protecting an individual from harm, the role of the researcher, the location of 'power' in PAR, and the ownership of the research. The flexibility of PAR in use and its main features are also related to the decisions made and actions taken in response to ethical issues. It is particularly important in PAR to proceed according to the participants, and to involve them from the beginning of the process, in order to insure the equal balance of power between participants and researcher.

Developing social work practice through engaging practitioners in action research

“…Different types of action research also vary according to the degree of control exerted by the researcher over outcomes and definitions of improvement (Corbett et al, 2007;Lo¨fman et al, 2004;Oliver, 1992). As already stated, an aim of the study was to improve professional practice for the benefit of children using social work services.…”

Estudio sobre percepción de valores éticos en un proyecto de desarrollo tecnológico

“…Sin embargo, se podría argumentar que los participantes no expresaron su oposición al consentimiento informado porque no lo entendieron. En este sentido, ya que los participantes no tenían ninguna patología que limitase su comprensión, tenemos que entender estas respuestas como el resultado de un documento bien presentado con información clara sobre los derechos de los participantes en la prueba (Löfman, 2004).…”

Conceptual frameworks and terminology in doctoral nursing research

“…Blythe et al (2013) identify these as participants making assumptions about what the researcher already knows, maintaining impartiality and managing emotions and expectations. Lofman et al (2004) add that an outsider can be deemed an insider if they share the same profession as the participants as this affiliation can confer 'credibility'.…”