Ethical Challenges of Complex Products: Case of Goldman Sachs and the Synthetic Collateralized Debt Obligations

Abstract

In analyzing complex products, this study selected the company Goldman Sachs and one of its product offerings, the synthetic collateralized debt obligation (synthetic CDO). The study later analyzed the ethical implications of providing such a complex product to customers. A review of the literature indicates that researchers identified this product and other associated derivatives of the mortgage backed securities as the main causes of the 2008 financial crisis in the United States of America. As such, Goldman Sachs’ offering of the product posed ethical and moral issues. An analysis of the company and its offering was done under the lenses of various ethical theories such as Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning, the Kantian ethics, the utilitarian perspective, Friedman’s shareholder theory, the stakeholder theory, the market approach to consumer protection, and the contract view of consumer protection. Besides Friedman’s shareholder theory, all other theories judged the product offering morally wrong and unethical. At the end of the study, the author suggested a contribution to knowledge regarding Kohlberg’s theory of moral reasoning in its application to organizations. The author also suggested further research to validate the outcome of Friedman’s shareholder theory regarding this case.

Chaos, Complexity, and Contingency Theories: A Comparative Analysis and Application to the 21st Century Organization

“…The simulation of 100 months of a strategic decision to source from Singapore revealed that any instability in the supply chain would increase costs and expenses, disrupt production, and decrease revenue and satisfaction. That is exactly what happened around the world with the 2008 economic and financial crisis (Lartey, 2020) or the 2019 corona virus spread (COVID-19) that became a pandemic in 2020 (Remuzzi & Remuzzi, 2020). Levy's study suggests that managers can use chaos theory as a framework to account for dynamic evolution and complex interactions that disrupt organizations.…”

The Role of Investment Banking in the Global Financial Crisis: Taking Goldman Sachs as an Example

“…This failure was later altered by cautious management of the new CEO in 1950s. The managers of Goldman Sachs have commented that in order to ensure "long lasting greed", it is essential for the corporation to value reputation by approaching investment opportunities with cautious actions [9]. However, during the financial crisis, Goldman Sachs' attitude towards risk in financial instruments has given rise to moral and ethical considerations of how it might be suggestive to questioning outcomes.…”

“…However, during the financial crisis, Goldman Sachs' attitude towards risk in financial instruments has given rise to moral and ethical considerations of how it might be suggestive to questioning outcomes. In the case proposed by Lartey (2020), it argued that Goldman Sachs has caused conflicts of interests between the investment bank and its clients through participating in insurance activities [9]. The case proposed in the article is Abacus 2007-AC1, where the deal enables policy holders to obtain insurance returns upon investment failure of their bet.…”