Abstract:Resumo Campo das metrias da informação com nove anos de existência, a altmetria existe no Brasil há seis anos. Se o campo for considerado de forma mais ampla, tomando-se, como exemplo, estudos cientométricos a partir de dados cibermétricos ou webométricos, é possível identificar trabalhos mais antigos. Entretanto, o processo de delimitação do referido campo se deu em 2010, quando Jason Priem cunhou o termo “altmetrics” via Twitter, tendo o mencionado vocábulo chegado ao Brasil como “altmetria” em 2013. No estu… Show more
“…Angolan universities also benefit from the Brazilian government's commitment to open access scholarly publications, and therefore have access to huge quantities of peer-reviewed scholarship at no cost. All you need is to read Portuguese and know where to look, because like so many learning structures, the Brazilian system is not easily legible to Google Scholar algorithms nor do outsiders easily comprehend the vast available knowledge that the national system Lattes makes accessible to readers of Portuguese (de Brito et al, 2016;Gouveia, 2019;Costa & Leite, 2008). See Footnote 58.…”
Universities take for granted and are taken for granted. Their specificity to the places in which they operate is often lost in the uniformity of ranking, global branding, and translatable structure. Political imperatives such as inequality, changing governments, and the growing awareness of a planet in peril do sometimes lead to structures-of-knowledge scrutiny. Most academics have little time for this, as they race in the hamster-wheels of neoliberal knowledge production and consumption. Yet knowledge has radically altered since the emergence of the internet as a tool of individual and collective thinking. The structures of learning, teaching and hierarchy that shape lives are struggling to make sense of the sudden change. This chapter is written in haiku form with the arguments elaborated in footnotes, engaging the reader's increasing skill at thinking on multiple levels at once, and posing questions of the present and future of education for good.
“…Angolan universities also benefit from the Brazilian government's commitment to open access scholarly publications, and therefore have access to huge quantities of peer-reviewed scholarship at no cost. All you need is to read Portuguese and know where to look, because like so many learning structures, the Brazilian system is not easily legible to Google Scholar algorithms nor do outsiders easily comprehend the vast available knowledge that the national system Lattes makes accessible to readers of Portuguese (de Brito et al, 2016;Gouveia, 2019;Costa & Leite, 2008). See Footnote 58.…”
Universities take for granted and are taken for granted. Their specificity to the places in which they operate is often lost in the uniformity of ranking, global branding, and translatable structure. Political imperatives such as inequality, changing governments, and the growing awareness of a planet in peril do sometimes lead to structures-of-knowledge scrutiny. Most academics have little time for this, as they race in the hamster-wheels of neoliberal knowledge production and consumption. Yet knowledge has radically altered since the emergence of the internet as a tool of individual and collective thinking. The structures of learning, teaching and hierarchy that shape lives are struggling to make sense of the sudden change. This chapter is written in haiku form with the arguments elaborated in footnotes, engaging the reader's increasing skill at thinking on multiple levels at once, and posing questions of the present and future of education for good.
“…Angolan universities also benefit from the Brazilian government's commitment to open access scholarly publications, and therefore have access to huge quantities of peer-reviewed scholarship at no cost. All you need is to read Portuguese and know where to look, because like so many learning structures, the Brazilian system is not easily legible to Google Scholar algorithms nor do outsiders easily comprehend the vast available knowledge that the national system Lattes makes accessible to readers of Portuguese (de Brito et al, 2016;Gouveia, 2019;Costa & Leite, 2008). See Footnote 58.…”
After decades of turbulence and acute crises in recent years, how can we build a better future for Higher Education?
Thoughtfully edited by Laura Czerniewicz and Catherine Cronin, this rich and diverse collection by academics and professionals from across 17 countries and many disciplines offers a variety of answers to this question. It addresses the need to set new values for universities, trapped today in narratives dominated by financial incentives and performance indicators, and examines those “wicked” problems which need multiple solutions, resolutions, experiments, and imaginaries.
This mix of new and well-established voices provides hopeful new ways of thinking about Higher Education across a range of contexts, and how to concretise initiatives to deal with local and global challenges. In an unusual and refreshing way, the contributors provide insights about resilience tactics and collective actions across different levels of higher education using an array of styles and formats including essays, poetry, and speculative fiction.
With its interdisciplinary appeal, this book presents itself as a provocative and inspiring resource for universities, students, and scholars. Higher Education for Good courageously offers critique, hope, and purpose for the practice and the trajectory of Higher Education.
“…Na terceira etapa, são realizados testes utilizando dados bibliométricos, patentométricos, altmétricos e de linguagem natural. Os dados bibliométricos utilizados foram obtidos após busca pelo termo "altmetria" em todos os campos na base de dados Web Of Science, gerando três resultados: Doc.1) Maricato e Martins (2017); Doc.2) Rocha e Silva (2020); Doc.3) Gouveia (2019). Para isso, os três documentos foram acoplados tomando como unidades de acoplamento os autores citados em cada documento (Figura 15a).…”
Introdução: O uso de linguagens de programação no contexto dos Estudos Métricos da Informação tem conquistado espaço junto à comunidade científica da área devido sua praticidade, gratuidade e possivelmente, baixo custo computacional. Objetivos: Apresenta uma ferramenta bibliométrica nova, gratuita e alternativa, voltada para análises relacionais de citação, com foco no acoplamento bibliográfico, construída sobre a linguagem de programação R, intitulada The Coupler. Metodologia: Fundamenta as análises relacionais de citação, cocitação e acoplamento bibliográfico sob a ótica matemática e apresenta o código fonte da ferramenta e as condições em que foi construída e disponibilizada ao público. Para testagem da ferramenta, utiliza dados genéricos e expõe todas suas funcionalidades. Para demonstração de uso com dados reais, opera dados bibliométricos, patentométricos, altmétricos e linguagem natural. Resultados: A ferramenta é capaz de construir matrizes de citação, acoplamento e cocitação além de calcular os valores normalizados via Cosseno de Salton e Índice de Jaccard das frequências de acoplamento bibliográfico. Ainda, constrói a rede de acoplamento bibliográfico e identifica as unidades de acoplamento responsáveis por cada par de acoplamento. Este último, resultado incomum aos tradicionais softwares bibliométricos. Conclusão: Conclui que a ferramenta se comporta de maneira esperada e satisfatória ao processar tanto os dados genéricos quanto os dados bibliométricos, patentométricos, altmétricos e de linguagem natural. Dentre os resultados, constata como principal resultado, e diferencial dos demais softwares, a identificação das unidades de acoplamento, bem como os cálculos das frequências de acoplamento normalizadas via Cosseno de Salton e Índice de Jaccard.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.