2016
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-053620160000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo da repetibilidade genética em clones de couve

Abstract: RESUMO: Durante o ciclo vegetativo da couve é possível fazer várias colheitas. Dessa forma, é necessário estabelecer o número mínimo de colheitas que possibilita a seleção confiável de genótipos superiores. Objetivou-se estimar o número mínimo de medições para a seleção de clones de couve com maior eficiência e confiabilidade por meio do estudo de repetibilidade. O experimento foi conduzido na Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, utilizando o delineamento em blocos casualizados com 27 genó… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and Brazilian Oil Palm (Elaeis oleifera (H.B.K.) Cortés) (Chia et al, 2009), araça (Psidium cattleyanum) and pitanga (Eugenia uniflora) (DANNER et al, 2010); peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) (BERGO et al, 2013), sweet orange (NEGREIROS et al, 2014), and kale (Brassica oleracea) (AZEVEDO et al, 2016), the estimates obtained by the Anova method were always lower than those obtained by the multivariate analysis because, according to Cruz et al (2012), the Anova method does not remove the environmental effect of alternating production in different years, underestimating the repeatability coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and Brazilian Oil Palm (Elaeis oleifera (H.B.K.) Cortés) (Chia et al, 2009), araça (Psidium cattleyanum) and pitanga (Eugenia uniflora) (DANNER et al, 2010); peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) (BERGO et al, 2013), sweet orange (NEGREIROS et al, 2014), and kale (Brassica oleracea) (AZEVEDO et al, 2016), the estimates obtained by the Anova method were always lower than those obtained by the multivariate analysis because, according to Cruz et al (2012), the Anova method does not remove the environmental effect of alternating production in different years, underestimating the repeatability coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the variation in the r estimates, the high values obtained by the multivariate methods, especially PCCV, indicate regularity in the repetition of clone performance over the evaluations (Cruz et al, 2012 Using the PCCV method, the minimum number of fruits required to predict the true value of the clone, with 95% determination coefficient for fruit length (2), fruit diameter (14), fruit mass (3), pulp mass (3), skin mass (15), pulp yield (8), skin thickness (13), number of seeds (11), firmness (7), soluble solids (1), titratable acidity (1), soluble solids/ titratable acidity ratio (3), and pH (6) will be 15 fruits, as it was established for the trait skin mass, since the estimates of the other traits are included in this value, and fruit quantities over 11 for the traits fruit diameter, skin mass, skin thickness, and number of seeds are due to their larger effect of the interaction genotype x environment (AZEVEDO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In multi-harvest crops such as kale, it is important to perform repeatability studies (Chia, Lopes, Cunha, Rocha, & Lopes, 2009;Azevedo et al, 2016a). This enables the establishment of a number of harvests that must be performed for efficient selection of the best progenies (Sobrinho, Borges, Lédo, & Kopp, 2010;Bruna, Moreto, & Dalbó, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kale is a vegetable with nutritional characteristics of interest, such as high levels of carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins and fibre (Novo, Prela-Pantano, Trani, & Blat, 2010). However, there is a need for cultivars with higher productivity and resistance to the crop's major pests (Azevedo et al, 2016a;Azevedo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation