2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047004379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimativas da prevalência de desnutrição infantil nos municípios brasileiros em 2006

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To estimate the prevalence of malnutrition in children for all Brazilian municipalities. METHODS:A multilevel logistic regression model was used to estimate the individual probability of malnutrition in 5,507 Brazilian municipalities in 2006, in terms of predictive factors grouped according to hierarchical levels. The response variable was child malnutrition (children aged from six to 59 months with height for age and sex below -2 z-scores, according to the World Health Organization standard). The pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was considerable variability concerning the units of analysis, the geographical regions included, methods of measurement of FHS coverage, and the outcome measured. Among the 31included studies [ 23 53 ], six used individual-level data [ 34 , 47 – 49 , 51 , 52 ], with samples ranging from 961 to 7,534 subjects, whilst the remaining 25 studies were ecological analyses. Most (n = 19) ecological studies used municipalities as the unit of analysis, but three chose to analyze micro-regions (set of several neighbor municipalities) [ 25 , 32 , 44 ] or states [ 31 , 37 ] ( S2 Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was considerable variability concerning the units of analysis, the geographical regions included, methods of measurement of FHS coverage, and the outcome measured. Among the 31included studies [ 23 53 ], six used individual-level data [ 34 , 47 – 49 , 51 , 52 ], with samples ranging from 961 to 7,534 subjects, whilst the remaining 25 studies were ecological analyses. Most (n = 19) ecological studies used municipalities as the unit of analysis, but three chose to analyze micro-regions (set of several neighbor municipalities) [ 25 , 32 , 44 ] or states [ 31 , 37 ] ( S2 Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of food insecurity found by our study in Assis Brasil is lower than the average in Acre state (47.5%); however, it must be taken into account that PNAD joins results from urban and rural areas, in addition to gathering data from the capital with data from isolated cities from inner Acre state, the access to which is only by inland waterways or air. In these remote areas of the state are cities with the highest prevalence of malnutrition in Brazil 28 , which is probably the reason why the mean prevalence of food insecurity in Acre is larger than that in the Northern Region as well as than the national average. Additionally, our study involves only families that have children under 5 years of age while PNAD samples all households.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariates of interest corresponded to the socioeconomic characteristics (represented by the proxy maternal education in years of schooling: ≤ 8, 9|-12, ≥ 12), to the infants characteristics (age: 6|-7 months, 7|-8 months, 8|-9 months, 9|-10 months, 10|-11 months, 11|-12 months; sex: male, female), to the mothers characteristics (age range: < 20, 20|-35, ≥ 35; working outside: no, yes, parity: primiparous, multiparous) and to the health services (outpatient follow-up: private or insurance plan, public network; type of delivery: vaginal, cesarean section). The first contextual factor studied regarding the municipality was the municipal prevalence of child undernutrition (≥ 10%, < 10%), a variable used as a proxy for poverty and estimated by Benicio et al 22 from data from the 2006 National Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) and the 2000 Demographic Census sample. Child undernutrition was measured by the height deficit for age below -2 Z-scores of the 2006 WHO growth pattern.…”
Section: 370 Low Birth Weight Infants Aged Between 6|-12 Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%