2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-008-9076-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of yield zones using aerial images and yield data from a few tracks of a combine harvester

Abstract: Yield maps derived from yield mapping systems are often erroneous not only due to limitations in measuring the yield precisely but due to insufficient consideration of the requirements of yield mapping systems in practice as well. Aerial images of cultivated crop fields at an advanced growth stage frequently provide a spatial pattern similar to that of yield maps. Therefore, the possibility of generating a yield map using aerial images and measured yield data of a few tracks was examined for a period of 2 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The system showed an R 2 of 0.90 when correlated to a manual stand count. Domsch et al (2008) used RGB aerial imagery taken at a growing stage to estimate crop yield at harvesting time. When the researchers used VARI (introduced by Stark et al (2000)) and the data for a selected few tracks, VARI versus measured yield showed linear patterns for rye fields (R 2 :0.40 and 0.75) and power patterns for winter barley fields (R 2 :0.76 and 0.86).…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system showed an R 2 of 0.90 when correlated to a manual stand count. Domsch et al (2008) used RGB aerial imagery taken at a growing stage to estimate crop yield at harvesting time. When the researchers used VARI (introduced by Stark et al (2000)) and the data for a selected few tracks, VARI versus measured yield showed linear patterns for rye fields (R 2 :0.40 and 0.75) and power patterns for winter barley fields (R 2 :0.76 and 0.86).…”
Section: Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Super-rice was chosen as the test object, it was hoped that the broken white and whole yellow kernels in the visual window could reflect more light and be more clearly "seen" and "classified" by the camera [14,15] . In addition, the light distribution was supposed to be homogeneous to avoid local over the brightness of the image caused by the reflection highlights of transparent visual windows [16][17][18][19] . Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the angle and distance of the surface light source illuminating at the visual window [20,21] .…”
Section: Light Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when UAS derived VIs have been used, especially in small plots and comparing varieties or treatments, other VIs have appeared as good predictors. For example, commonly selected UAS derived VIs that have been good predictors, aside from NDVI [ 22 , 31 ], include Green-Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI) [ 2 , 11 , 22 , 31 , 32 ], Visible Atmospherically Resistant Index (VARI) [ 33 35 ], and Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) [ 11 , 22 , 36 ]. Varied modeling procedures for incorporating and evaluating different VIs in yield prediction have been reported, including hierarchical linear regression [ 29 ], multiple linear regression [ 22 , 33 ], multivariate regression modeling with other phenological matrices [ 21 ], random forest [ 11 , 32 , 37 ], support vector machine [ 32 ], and boosted regression tree [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%