2020
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2019.2948896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Thickness and Speed of Sound in Cortical Bone Using Multifocus Pulse-Echo Ultrasound

Abstract: Most bone loss during the development of osteoporosis occurs in cortical bone at the peripheral skeleton. Decreased cortical thickness (Ct.Th) and the prevalence of large pores at the tibia are associated with reduced bone strength at the hip. Ct.Th and cortical sound velocity, i.e., a surrogate marker for changes of cortical porosity (Ct.Po), are key biomarkers for the identification of patients at high fracture risk. In this study, we have developed a method using a conventional ultrasound array transducer t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring velocities in vivo can be achieved, e.g. with axial transmission (Foiret et al, 2014) or quantitative imaging (Renaud et al, 2018;Nguyen Minh et al, 2020) and can complement US diagnosis of cortical bone fragility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measuring velocities in vivo can be achieved, e.g. with axial transmission (Foiret et al, 2014) or quantitative imaging (Renaud et al, 2018;Nguyen Minh et al, 2020) and can complement US diagnosis of cortical bone fragility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound (US) methods have been developed as an alternative to DXA to provide a non-ionizing, portable, and affordable diagnostic tool for osteoporosis (Laugier and Haïat, 2011;Raum et al, 2014). Since cortical bone plays an important role in bone resistance (Mayhew et al, 2005;Holzer et al, 2009), and because a large part of bone loss arises from the cortical compartment (Zebaze et al, 2010), several US approaches have been specifically designed to assess cortical bone (Karjalainen et al, 2008;Sai et al, 2010;Minonzio et al, 2019;Renaud et al, 2018;Nguyen Minh et al, 2020;Grimal and Laugier, 2019). These approaches aim at evaluating cortical bone thickness or material properties (e.g., mass density, elasticity, bulk wave velocities), which are dramatically altered with bone pathologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute deviation of individual values from age and gender-matched controls may be a suitable indicator for the severity of the mineralization deficit. However, the individual parameters contributing to the reduction of ν FAS in XLH patients remain subject to further studies, which should also integrate more recent techniques that are able to measure Ct.Th, Ct.Po, and speed of sound independently (24,36,37) as well as second-generation HR-pQCT, which can provide site-matched measurements at central shaft regions. As BDAT and other ultrasound-based quantitative bone imaging modalities use no ionizing radiation, they would be ideal for the treatment monitoring of children and young adults with bone diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We anticipate that the evaluation of the pore diameter distribution has the potential to establish novel biomarkers that are sensitive to discriminate pathological tissue remodeling from normal age and gender specific alterations prior to the reduction of bone strength. The latter is predominantly predicted by the reduction of cortical thickness [37], which can be measured with the same system [44] or similar multi-channel systems [4] in combination with the compressional sound velocity by means of refraction corrected imaging, or alternatively by means of axial transmission ultrasound [3,15]. Thus, the combined assessment of cortical thickness, sound velocity, and pore size distribution in a mobile, non-ionizing measurement system could have a major impact to prevent osteoporotic fractures.…”
Section: Transition To Future In-vivo Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%