Deconvolution is used in a variety of areas to extract the impulse response e ( t ) of a linear system from experimental measurements of the system output y ( t ) and input excitation function x ( t ) . Some specific examples where deconvolution is important include: analysis of fluorescence decay data (Jakeman et al., 1978a); evaluation of transport functionals in the human circulatory system (Jakeman et al., 1978b;Jordinson et al., 1976); determination of transport properties of the phloem in plants (Minchin, 1978); interpretation of hydrological response data (Young, 1978); refinement and reconstruction of absorption spectra (Blass and Halsey, 1981); process control (Young et al., 1973); and impulse response estimation from chemical reactor tracer response data (Wen and Fan, 1975). A knowledge of the impulse response e ( t ) is a necessary first step for these and other related applications where model discrimination and parameter estimation are key objectives.For linear systems, the impulse response e ( t ) is related to the system input excitation function x ( t ) and system output y ( t ) by the convolution integral Random noise and measurement errors that are present in the experimental response data are represented by the unknown noise function n(t). As applied to tracer testing, x ( t ) and y ( t ) may represent the responses of two sensors located in a flow process using the configuration shown in Figure 1 of Van Zee et al. (1987). Also, x ( t ) could be the response of the combined tracer injection-sampling system when the test section of a flow process is removed, whiley(t) would be the response obtained when the test section is inserted in place (cf., Mills and Dudukovik, 1981;Wakao et al., 1980).The common approach for obtaining the impulse response from Eq. 1 is to use Fourier transforms. Applications of this method to Eq. 1 yields the following estimate of the Fourier transformed impulse response where j = and w denotes the frequency. Applying inverse Fourier transformation to Eq. 2, or so-called inverse filtering (Blass and Halsey, 1981), yields the following estimate of the time-domain impulse response where F-' denotes the inverse Fourier transform operator Expressions for the Fourier transform and its inverse operator are given in standard texts (cf., Churchill, 1972). In practice, evaluation of the Fourier transform and the inverse Fourier transform is often performed by numerical quadrature (Davis and Rabinowitz, 1975).When random noise and measurement errors in the data are sufficiently small, the quotient Y ( j w ) / X ( j w ) is well-behaved so that a reliable estimate of the time-domain impulse response 3(t) can be obtained. However, for many experimental systems, the errors in B ( j o ) defined by N ( j w ) / X ( j w ) either rapidly increase with increasing values of the frequency w, or randomly, vary in such a way that the estimate 2 ( t ) is obscured by noise. One objective of this paper is to briefly illustrate this observation using actual data collected in our laboratory from tric...