2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility 2008
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.2008.4652132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the statistical variation of crosstalk in wiring harnesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…divided the wiring harness into several segments to deal with the problem of twisted wires which caused the position of the wires to change along the length of the harness [15]. Wires are assumed to remain in the same positions along each segment of the harness and to take on new positions in adjoining sections.…”
Section: Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…divided the wiring harness into several segments to deal with the problem of twisted wires which caused the position of the wires to change along the length of the harness [15]. Wires are assumed to remain in the same positions along each segment of the harness and to take on new positions in adjoining sections.…”
Section: Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of the RLCG parameter matrix is an important step in solving the crosstalk problem of the non-uniform transmission line [14]. The statistical model of the RLCG parameter matrix is also a research hotspot for the field of crosstalk in harness layout [15], [16]. Shishuang Sun used the mathematical method of convolution and probability to process the RLCG parameter matrix of the hand-assembled cable bundle and made a range of predictions on the crosstalk [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method needs large repeated computations and the results are only suitable for the case studied. Many researches proposed the worst-case methods for transmission lines in some specific cases, such as weak coupling and strong coupling [8][9][10][11]. The worst-case methods can provide quick estimations for designs; however, the results may differ greatly from the actual values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%