2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the soil-dependent time-varying parameters of the hopper sedimentation model: The FPF versus the BPF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formula (14) is referred to as the constant gain approximation of the gain function; cf., [31]. It is a popular choice in applications [31,[35][36][37] and is equivalent to the approximation used in the deterministic and stochastic EnKBF [7,[21][22][23][24]. N) )(X i − X (N) ) T are the empirical mean and the empirical variance, respectively.…”
Section: Constant Gain Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formula (14) is referred to as the constant gain approximation of the gain function; cf., [31]. It is a popular choice in applications [31,[35][36][37] and is equivalent to the approximation used in the deterministic and stochastic EnKBF [7,[21][22][23][24]. N) )(X i − X (N) ) T are the empirical mean and the empirical variance, respectively.…”
Section: Constant Gain Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation reduces to the Kalman gain in the linear Gaussian case. For the general case, this approximation often suffices in practice particularly so when the conditional distribution is unimodal [56], [7], [47].…”
Section: Feedback Particle Filter With Concentrated Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ease of taking the expectation, we convert (47) to its Itô form (see Theorem 1.2 in [52]): For real-valued continuous semi-martingales A, B,C,…”
Section: Appendix a Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In numerical evaluations and comparisons, it is often found that the control-based algorithms exhibit smaller simulation variance and better scaling properties with the problem dimension (number of state variables). For example, several research groups have reported favorable comparisons for the FPF algorithm as compared to the traditional particle filter algorithms; cf., [24], [23], [2], [25], [29]. However, there is no theoretical justification/understanding of this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%