2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11600-019-00362-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the quality factor based on the microseismicity recordings from Northern Poland

Abstract: We use the peak frequency method to estimate effective P- and S-wave quality factors (QP and QS) based on the recorded waveforms of microseismic events. We analyze downhole datasets recorded during the hydraulic stimulation of the two unconventional gas reservoirs located in the northern part of Poland. The effective attenuation is lower in the deeper reservoir consistent with higher compaction. In both cases, we observe high QS values relative to QP which is consistent with attenuation coefficients of saturat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The proposed technique has the advantage that it requires only the location of the event and the measure of the PGVs that, compared to other measures such as P-and S-wave picking (necessary to imple- 12,800-9200 -605.894 < 0.0001 ment tomographic approaches) or P-wave pulse width measure (e.g., Zollo and de Lorenzo 2001) or the peak frequency (e.g., Wandycz et al 2019) are more readily measured after the earthquake occurrence. Table 9 Coefficients and relative uncertainties for the resolution analysis…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• The proposed technique has the advantage that it requires only the location of the event and the measure of the PGVs that, compared to other measures such as P-and S-wave picking (necessary to imple- 12,800-9200 -605.894 < 0.0001 ment tomographic approaches) or P-wave pulse width measure (e.g., Zollo and de Lorenzo 2001) or the peak frequency (e.g., Wandycz et al 2019) are more readily measured after the earthquake occurrence. Table 9 Coefficients and relative uncertainties for the resolution analysis…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of the present analysis is supported by empirical analyses that recognize the need of regionalizing the GMPE in terms of anelastic attenuation in addition to the geometrical attenuation to avoid, for example, an overestimation of the residual standard deviation (Atkinson and Morrison 2009;Kale et al 2015;Kotha et al 2016) and by theoretical studies that demonstrate how peak-ground motion parameters and peak frequency parameters are related to earthquake stress-drop, geometrical spreading and anelastic attenuation (Baltay et al 2013;Lior and Ziv 2018;Wandycz et al 2019). It is thus possible to think of an inverse procedure that allows to infer stress-drop or anelastic attenuation from peak-ground motion parameters (e.g., Lior and Ziv2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, laboratory measurements (e.g. 20 , 21 ) and data analysis recorded during field operations 6 , 22 suggest that the same phenomena can also affect the anelastic attenuation of the rocks since anelastic attenuation is generally assumed to be due to inter-crack motion or fluid flow between pores depending on the rock type (e.g. 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%