Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds

Abstract

The knowledge of the relationship that links radiation dose and image quality is a prerequisite to any optimization of medical diagnostic radiology. Image quality depends, on the one hand, on the physical parameters such as contrast, resolution, and noise, and on the other hand, on characteristics of the observer that assesses the image. While the role of contrast and resolution is precisely defined and recognized, the influence of image noise is not yet fully understood. Its measurement is often based on imaging uniform test objects, even though real images contain anatomical backgrounds whose statistical nature is much different from test objects used to assess system noise. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the importance of variations in background anatomy by quantifying its effect on a series of detection tasks. Several types of mammographic backgrounds and signals were examined by psychophysical experiments in a two-alternative forced-choice detection task. According to hypotheses concerning the strategy used by the human observers, their signal to noise ratio was determined. This variable was also computed for a mathematical model based on the statistical decision theory. By comparing theoretical model and experimental results, the way that anatomical structure is perceived has been analyzed. Experiments showed that the observer's behavior was highly dependent upon both system noise and the anatomical background. The anatomy partly acts as a signal recognizable as such and partly as a pure noise that disturbs the detection process. This dual nature of the anatomy is quantified. It is shown that its effect varies according to its amplitude and the profile of the object being detected. The importance of the noisy part of the anatomy is, in some situations, much greater than the system noise. Hence, reducing the system noise by increasing the dose will not improve task performance. This observation indicates that the tradeoff between dose and image quality might be optimized by accepting a higher system noise. This could lead to a better resolution, more contrast, or less dose.

Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space

“…However, projection images contain anatomical overlaps that limit their efficacy. 23 Thus, there may be a relative merit in using one imaging mode over the other. In a previous article, we demonstrated potential clinical advantages of using projection images; 24 however, no comparison of performance between projection images and reconstructed slices was presented.…”

A Technique for Simulating the Effect of Dose Reduction on Image Quality in Digital Chest Radiography

“…17 Its strategy consists of match filtering the image by the shape of the signal profile filtered by the visual-response function. In our experiments, we considered the signal to be known and always located at the same position (signal known exactly case).…”

Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system

“…Many investigators [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have shown that it is not the system (including quantum) noise that is the limiting factor in chest radiography, but rather the projected patient anatomy or "anatomical noise". It therefore follows that any images used to optimise a digital radiographic system for chest radiography must contain clinically realistic anatomical features and noise.…”